NOWL vs. FBL
NOWL (GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF) and FBL (GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NOWL charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for FBL.
Performance
NOWL vs. FBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NOWL achieves a -55.17% return, which is significantly lower than FBL's -19.72% return.
NOWL
- 1D
- -15.19%
- 1M
- 53.22%
- YTD
- -55.17%
- 6M
- -63.42%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBL
- 1D
- 8.48%
- 1M
- 2.55%
- YTD
- -19.72%
- 6M
- -15.34%
- 1Y
- -29.78%
- 3Y*
- 33.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NOWL vs. FBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NOWL GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF | -55.17% | -42.58% |
FBL GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF | -19.72% | -21.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between NOWL and FBL is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NOWL vs. FBL — Risk / Return Rank
NOWL
FBL
NOWL vs. FBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF (NOWL) and GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NOWL | FBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.76 | 1.12 | -1.88 |
Drawdowns
NOWL vs. FBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOWL drawdown since its inception was -86.57%, which is greater than FBL's maximum drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOWL and FBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NOWL | FBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.57% | -61.15% | -25.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -61.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -61.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.11% | -47.97% | -28.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.53% | -16.41% | -31.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 32.76% | — |
Volatility
NOWL vs. FBL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NOWL | FBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 17.63% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 53.15% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 103.33% | 70.42% | +32.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 103.33% | 71.06% | +32.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 103.33% | 71.06% | +32.27% |
NOWL vs. FBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
NOWL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FBL's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
NOWL vs. FBL - Dividend Comparison
NOWL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FBL GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF | 2.58% | 2.07% | 0.00% | 51.58% |
NOWL GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NOWL and FBL have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FBL is cheaper at 1.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FBL is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for NOWL.
FBL has the higher dividend yield at 2.58%, compared with 0.00% for NOWL.
Their fees differ too: 1.50% for NOWL and 1.15% for FBL.
Find the right allocation for NOWL and FBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer