NOW vs. CHAT

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

NOW (ServiceNow, Inc) is a stock, while CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) is Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Over the past 3 years, NOW returned -2.72%/yr vs 48.02%/yr for CHAT. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NOW vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ServiceNow, Inc (NOW) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOW achieves a -33.32% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 57.97% return.

NOW

• 1D: -0.90%
• 1M: 7.45%
• YTD: -33.32%
• 6M: -40.96%
• 1Y: -48.34%
• 3Y*: -2.72%
• 5Y*: 0.51%
• 10Y*: 21.48%

CHAT

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: 8.95%
• YTD: 57.97%
• 6M: 60.59%
• 1Y: 113.65%
• 3Y*: 48.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOW vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NOW ServiceNow, Inc	-33.32%	-27.75%	50.05%	43.33%
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	57.97%	49.85%	30.98%	21.04%

Correlation

The correlation between NOW and CHAT is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2023	0.44

Over the past year, the correlation between NOW and CHAT has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

NOW vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOW

NOW Risk / Return Rank: 8
NOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
NOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
NOW Omega Ratio Rank: 7
NOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
NOW Martin Ratio Rank: 8

CHAT

CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 92
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 89
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOW vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ServiceNow, Inc (NOW) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NOW	CHAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.99	3.34	-4.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.44	3.60	-5.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	1.50	-0.68
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.82	6.79	-7.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.45	19.03	-20.48

NOW vs. CHAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOW Sharpe Ratio is -0.99, which is lower than the CHAT Sharpe Ratio of 3.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOW and CHAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NOW vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOW drawdown since its inception was -64.54%, which is greater than CHAT's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOW and CHAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	NOW	CHAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.54%	-31.34%	-33.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-60.28%	-16.28%	-44.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-64.54%	-31.34%	-33.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-64.54%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.54%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-56.36%	-9.97%	-46.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.78%	-5.39%	-8.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	34.02%	5.80%	+28.22%

Volatility

NOW vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison

ServiceNow, Inc (NOW) has a higher volatility of 25.56% compared to Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) at 16.40%. This indicates that NOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NOW	CHAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.56%	16.40%	+9.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.01%	28.00%	+19.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.12%	33.14%	+16.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.44%	30.65%	+12.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.86%	30.65%	+10.21%

Dividends

NOW vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison

NOW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%.

Position	TTM	2025
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	1.80%	2.85%
NOW ServiceNow, Inc	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NOW and CHAT in my portfolio?

NOW and CHAT have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NOW or CHAT?

NOW has higher volatility (25.56%) compared to CHAT (16.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOW dropped -64.54% vs CHAT's -31.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.