NOVZ vs. XUSP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NOVZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF) and XUSP (Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, NOVZ returned 16.53%/yr vs 25.24%/yr for XUSP. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

NOVZ vs. XUSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF (NOVZ) and Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF (XUSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOVZ achieves a 8.13% return, which is significantly lower than XUSP's 12.67% return.

NOVZ

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: 4.10%
• YTD: 8.13%
• 6M: 8.04%
• 1Y: 20.61%
• 3Y*: 16.53%
• 5Y*: 11.35%
• 10Y*: —

XUSP

• 1D: -0.86%
• 1M: 7.03%
• YTD: 12.67%
• 6M: 12.12%
• 1Y: 33.74%
• 3Y*: 25.24%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOVZ vs. XUSP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
NOVZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF	8.13%	13.03%	19.09%	18.06%	-3.85%
XUSP Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF	12.67%	18.27%	30.60%	26.46%	-9.24%

Correlation

The correlation between NOVZ and XUSP is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2022	0.98

The correlation between NOVZ and XUSP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

NOVZ vs. XUSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NOVZ	XUSP
Technology	31.6%	36.2%
Financial Services	14.0%	11.9%
Healthcare	10.8%	8.4%
Consumer Cyclical	10.5%	10.1%
Communication Services	9.5%	10.9%
Industrials	7.6%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	6.1%	4.9%
Energy	3.3%	3.5%
Utilities	2.6%	2.3%
Real Estate	2.2%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.8%

Return for Risk

NOVZ vs. XUSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOVZ

NOVZ Risk / Return Rank: 68
NOVZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
NOVZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
NOVZ Omega Ratio Rank: 67
NOVZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
NOVZ Martin Ratio Rank: 73

XUSP

XUSP Risk / Return Rank: 62
XUSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
XUSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
XUSP Omega Ratio Rank: 61
XUSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
XUSP Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOVZ vs. XUSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF (NOVZ) and Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF (XUSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NOVZ	XUSP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	2.13	+0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.04	2.87	+0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.37	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.08	2.80	+0.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.64	11.82	+1.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NOVZ vs. XUSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOVZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the XUSP Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOVZ and XUSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NOVZ	XUSP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.21	2.13	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.11	1.04	+0.07

Drawdowns

NOVZ vs. XUSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOVZ drawdown since its inception was -16.62%, smaller than the maximum XUSP drawdown of -22.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOVZ and XUSP.

Drawdown Indicators

	NOVZ	XUSP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.62%	-22.59%	+5.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.72%	-12.13%	+5.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.63%	-22.59%	+7.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.62%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.59%	-0.86%	+0.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.06%	-4.42%	+1.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.51%	2.86%	-1.35%

Volatility

NOVZ vs. XUSP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF (NOVZ) is 2.35%, while Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF (XUSP) has a volatility of 4.13%. This indicates that NOVZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XUSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NOVZ	XUSP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.35%	4.13%	-1.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.97%	11.89%	-4.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.39%	15.90%	-6.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.87%	19.21%	-6.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.71%	19.21%	-6.50%

NOVZ vs. XUSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NOVZ and XUSP have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

NOVZ vs. XUSP - Dividend Comparison

NOVZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, while XUSP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
NOVZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF	3.32%	3.58%	2.94%	2.27%	0.25%	0.52%
XUSP Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NOVZ and XUSP in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, NOVZ and XUSP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, NOVZ or XUSP?

XUSP has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to NOVZ (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOVZ dropped -16.62% vs XUSP's -22.59%.

Which ETF is better, NOVZ or XUSP?

On 3-year performance, XUSP leads with 25.24% vs 16.53% for NOVZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, NOVZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NOVZ or XUSP?

Over the 3-year period, XUSP has performed better with a 25.24% return vs 16.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NOVZ or XUSP?

NOVZ and XUSP have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NOVZ or XUSP?

NOVZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 0.00% for XUSP.

What is the main difference between NOVZ and XUSP?

They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Innovator.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NOVZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.