PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOVZ vs. APRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOVZ vs. APRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF (NOVZ) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NOVZ having a 6.09% return and APRW slightly lower at 5.94%.


NOVZ

1D
-0.94%
1M
-0.89%
YTD
6.09%
6M
5.32%
1Y
17.58%
3Y*
15.29%
5Y*
10.78%
10Y*

APRW

1D
-0.30%
1M
0.01%
YTD
5.94%
6M
6.07%
1Y
11.57%
3Y*
9.84%
5Y*
6.97%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOVZ vs. APRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
NOVZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF
6.09%13.03%19.09%18.06%-9.58%21.46%10.26%
APRW
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF
5.94%6.18%11.25%12.38%-2.90%5.58%3.76%

Correlation

The correlation between NOVZ and APRW is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2020

0.87

The correlation between NOVZ and APRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOVZ vs. APRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOVZ
NOVZ Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
NOVZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOVZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOVZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
NOVZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOVZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

APRW
APRW Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
APRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
APRW Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
APRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
APRW Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOVZ vs. APRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF (NOVZ) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NOVZAPRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

2.07

-0.74

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

13.01

-10.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.18

68.66

-57.48

NOVZ vs. APRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOVZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is lower than the APRW Sharpe Ratio of 4.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOVZ and APRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOVZ vs. APRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOVZ drawdown since its inception was -16.62%, which is greater than APRW's maximum drawdown of -9.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOVZ and APRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOVZAPRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.62%

-9.61%

-7.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.72%

-0.89%

-5.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.63%

-9.61%

-5.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.62%

-9.61%

-7.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.46%

-0.46%

-2.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.04%

-1.11%

-1.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

0.17%

+1.41%

Volatility

NOVZ vs. APRW - Volatility Comparison

TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF (NOVZ) has a higher volatility of 3.49% compared to AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW) at 1.14%. This indicates that NOVZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOVZAPRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.49%

1.14%

+2.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.54%

2.13%

+5.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.80%

2.71%

+7.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.94%

6.73%

+6.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.72%

6.40%

+6.32%

NOVZ vs. APRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOVZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than APRW's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOVZ vs. APRW - Dividend Comparison

NOVZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, while APRW has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
APRW
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.67%
NOVZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF
3.38%3.58%2.94%2.27%0.25%0.52%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOVZ and APRW have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOVZ has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to APRW (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOVZ dropped -16.62% vs APRW's -9.61%.

On 5-year performance, NOVZ leads with 10.78% vs 6.97% for APRW. On fees, APRW is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, APRW has been the lower-risk option at 1.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NOVZ has performed better with a 10.78% return vs 6.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

APRW is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for NOVZ.

NOVZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.38%, compared with 0.00% for APRW.

They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Allianz. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for NOVZ and 0.74% for APRW.

APRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.35 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOVZ and APRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer