NOVZ vs. DECZ
NOVZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF) and DECZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NOVZ is a Options Trading fund actively managed by TrueShares, while DECZ is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500. NOVZ is actively managed, while DECZ is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NOVZ returned 11.35%/yr vs 11.21%/yr for DECZ. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
NOVZ vs. DECZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NOVZ having a 8.13% return and DECZ slightly higher at 8.14%.
NOVZ
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 4.10%
- YTD
- 8.13%
- 6M
- 8.04%
- 1Y
- 20.61%
- 3Y*
- 16.53%
- 5Y*
- 11.35%
- 10Y*
- —
DECZ
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 4.15%
- YTD
- 8.14%
- 6M
- 8.12%
- 1Y
- 20.18%
- 3Y*
- 16.28%
- 5Y*
- 11.21%
- 10Y*
- —
NOVZ vs. DECZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOVZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF | 8.13% | 13.03% | 19.09% | 18.06% | -9.58% | 21.46% | 1.72% |
DECZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF | 8.14% | 12.34% | 18.89% | 18.32% | -8.93% | 20.15% | 1.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between NOVZ and DECZ is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2020 | 0.99 |
The correlation between NOVZ and DECZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
NOVZ vs. DECZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NOVZ
DECZ
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
NOVZ
DECZ
Financial Services
NOVZ
DECZ
Healthcare
NOVZ
DECZ
Consumer Cyclical
NOVZ
DECZ
Communication Services
NOVZ
DECZ
Industrials
NOVZ
DECZ
Consumer Defensive
NOVZ
DECZ
Energy
NOVZ
DECZ
Utilities
NOVZ
DECZ
Real Estate
NOVZ
DECZ
Basic Materials
NOVZ
DECZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NOVZ vs. DECZ — Risk / Return Rank
NOVZ
DECZ
NOVZ vs. DECZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF (NOVZ) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF (DECZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NOVZ | DECZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.21 | 2.12 | +0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.04 | 2.98 | +0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.38 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 2.69 | +0.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.64 | 11.35 | +2.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NOVZ | DECZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.21 | 2.12 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | 0.90 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.11 | 1.00 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
NOVZ vs. DECZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOVZ drawdown since its inception was -16.62%, roughly equal to the maximum DECZ drawdown of -16.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOVZ and DECZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NOVZ | DECZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.62% | -16.57% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.72% | -7.53% | +0.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.63% | -14.24% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.62% | -16.57% | -0.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.59% | -0.53% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.06% | -3.06% | 0.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.51% | 1.78% | -0.27% |
Volatility
NOVZ vs. DECZ - Volatility Comparison
TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF (NOVZ) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF (DECZ) have volatilities of 2.35% and 2.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NOVZ | DECZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.35% | 2.47% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.97% | 7.20% | -0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.39% | 9.57% | -0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.87% | 12.59% | +0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.71% | 12.39% | +0.32% |
NOVZ vs. DECZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both NOVZ and DECZ have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
NOVZ vs. DECZ - Dividend Comparison
NOVZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, more than DECZ's 3.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DECZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF | 3.03% | 3.28% | 2.55% | 1.23% | 1.44% | 0.46% |
NOVZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF | 3.32% | 3.58% | 2.94% | 2.27% | 0.25% | 0.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, NOVZ and DECZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DECZ has higher volatility (2.47%) compared to NOVZ (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOVZ dropped -16.62% vs DECZ's -16.57%.
On 5-year performance, NOVZ leads with 11.35% vs 11.21% for DECZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, NOVZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NOVZ has performed better with a 11.35% return vs 11.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NOVZ and DECZ have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
NOVZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 3.03% for DECZ.
NOVZ is categorized as Options Trading, while DECZ is Defined Outcome.
NOVZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NOVZ and DECZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer