PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOVZ vs. JUNZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOVZ vs. JUNZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF (NOVZ) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF (JUNZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NOVZ having a 8.13% return and JUNZ slightly higher at 8.42%.


NOVZ

1D
-0.59%
1M
4.10%
YTD
8.13%
6M
8.04%
1Y
20.61%
3Y*
16.53%
5Y*
11.35%
10Y*

JUNZ

1D
-0.40%
1M
4.04%
YTD
8.42%
6M
8.23%
1Y
21.10%
3Y*
16.22%
5Y*
9.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOVZ vs. JUNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NOVZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF
8.13%13.03%19.09%18.06%-9.58%10.82%
JUNZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF
8.42%12.83%17.32%17.28%-12.97%9.81%

Correlation

The correlation between NOVZ and JUNZ is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2021

0.98

The correlation between NOVZ and JUNZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

NOVZ vs. JUNZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NOVZ
JUNZ

Technology

31.6%
32.7%

Financial Services

14.0%
13.7%

Healthcare

10.8%
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%
10.7%

Communication Services

9.5%
9.5%

Industrials

7.6%
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

6.1%
5.8%

Energy

3.3%
3.2%

Utilities

2.6%
2.6%

Real Estate

2.2%
2.2%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

NOVZ
31.6%
JUNZ
32.7%

Financial Services

NOVZ
14.0%
JUNZ
13.7%

Healthcare

NOVZ
10.8%
JUNZ
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

NOVZ
10.5%
JUNZ
10.7%

Communication Services

NOVZ
9.5%
JUNZ
9.5%

Industrials

NOVZ
7.6%
JUNZ
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

NOVZ
6.1%
JUNZ
5.8%

Energy

NOVZ
3.3%
JUNZ
3.2%

Utilities

NOVZ
2.6%
JUNZ
2.6%

Real Estate

NOVZ
2.2%
JUNZ
2.2%

Basic Materials

NOVZ
1.8%
JUNZ
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOVZ vs. JUNZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOVZ
NOVZ Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
NOVZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOVZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOVZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
NOVZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOVZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

JUNZ
JUNZ Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
JUNZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JUNZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
JUNZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
JUNZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
JUNZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOVZ vs. JUNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF (NOVZ) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF (JUNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NOVZJUNZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.38

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

2.56

+0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.64

11.27

+2.37

NOVZ vs. JUNZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOVZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the JUNZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOVZ and JUNZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NOVZJUNZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

2.12

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

0.84

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.11

0.85

+0.26

Drawdowns

NOVZ vs. JUNZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOVZ drawdown since its inception was -16.62%, smaller than the maximum JUNZ drawdown of -17.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOVZ and JUNZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOVZJUNZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.62%

-17.88%

+1.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.72%

-8.27%

+1.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.63%

-14.06%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.62%

-17.88%

+1.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-0.40%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.06%

-4.27%

+1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.51%

1.88%

-0.37%

Volatility

NOVZ vs. JUNZ - Volatility Comparison

TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF (NOVZ) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF (JUNZ) have volatilities of 2.35% and 2.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOVZJUNZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.35%

2.45%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.97%

7.85%

-0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.39%

10.01%

-0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.87%

11.74%

+1.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.71%

11.73%

+0.98%

NOVZ vs. JUNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NOVZ and JUNZ have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

NOVZ vs. JUNZ - Dividend Comparison

NOVZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, more than JUNZ's 2.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
JUNZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF
2.12%2.30%3.97%6.03%0.56%0.32%
NOVZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF
3.32%3.58%2.94%2.27%0.25%0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, NOVZ and JUNZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JUNZ has higher volatility (2.45%) compared to NOVZ (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOVZ dropped -16.62% vs JUNZ's -17.88%.

On 5-year performance, NOVZ leads with 11.35% vs 9.84% for JUNZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, NOVZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NOVZ has performed better with a 11.35% return vs 9.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NOVZ and JUNZ have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

NOVZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 2.12% for JUNZ.

NOVZ is categorized as Options Trading, while JUNZ is Defined Outcome.

NOVZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOVZ and JUNZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer