PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOVT vs. RBC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NOVT vs. RBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Novanta Inc. (NOVT) and RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOVT achieves a 25.88% return, which is significantly lower than RBC's 30.36% return. Over the past 10 years, NOVT has outperformed RBC with an annualized return of 24.82%, while RBC has yielded a comparatively lower 23.22% annualized return.


NOVT

1D
-4.39%
1M
-6.70%
6M
16.14%
YTD
25.88%
1Y
13.78%
3Y*
-6.42%
5Y*
2.38%
10Y*
24.82%

RBC

1D
-1.83%
1M
-3.16%
6M
19.72%
YTD
30.36%
1Y
54.56%
3Y*
38.84%
5Y*
25.52%
10Y*
23.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOVT vs. RBC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOVT
Novanta Inc.
25.88%-22.11%-9.29%23.95%-22.95%49.15%33.67%40.38%26.00%138.10%
RBC
RBC Bearings Incorporated
30.36%49.91%5.00%36.08%4.19%17.32%14.10%21.72%3.72%36.19%

Correlation

The correlation between NOVT and RBC is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.46

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NOVT:

$5.33B

RBC:

$18.49B

EPS

NOVT:

$1.39

RBC:

$9.09

PE Ratio

NOVT:

107.70

RBC:

64.33

PEG Ratio

NOVT:

30.03

RBC:

0.91

PS Ratio

NOVT:

5.76

RBC:

9.89

PB Ratio

NOVT:

4.70

RBC:

5.52

Total Revenue (TTM)

NOVT:

$1.00B

RBC:

$1.87B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NOVT:

$444.51M

RBC:

$830.20M

EBITDA (TTM)

NOVT:

$150.84M

RBC:

$510.20M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOVT vs. RBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOVT
NOVT Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
NOVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOVT Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
NOVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOVT Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

RBC
RBC Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
RBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBC Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
RBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBC Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOVT vs. RBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Novanta Inc. (NOVT) and RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NOVTRBCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.35

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.51

4.74

-4.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.17

12.24

-11.07

NOVT vs. RBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOVT Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the RBC Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOVT and RBC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOVT vs. RBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOVT drawdown since its inception was -46.71%, smaller than the maximum RBC drawdown of -71.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOVT and RBC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOVTRBCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.71%

-71.79%

+25.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.97%

-11.56%

-15.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.71%

-17.81%

-28.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.71%

-35.26%

-11.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.71%

-55.06%

+8.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.56%

-9.91%

-9.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.32%

-12.70%

+0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.61%

4.47%

+8.14%

Volatility

NOVT vs. RBC - Volatility Comparison

Novanta Inc. (NOVT) has a higher volatility of 16.30% compared to RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) at 9.43%. This indicates that NOVT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOVTRBCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.30%

9.43%

+6.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.69%

20.53%

+14.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.35%

26.82%

+24.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.63%

31.56%

+9.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.21%

37.66%

+1.55%

Dividends

NOVT vs. RBC - Dividend Comparison

Neither NOVT nor RBC has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
NOVT
Novanta Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RBC
RBC Bearings Incorporated
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.49%4.10%0.67%0.75%

Financials

NOVT vs. RBC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Novanta Inc. and RBC Bearings Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00MOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
257.71M
518.00M
(NOVT) Total Revenue
(RBC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NOVT vs. RBC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Novanta Inc. and RBC Bearings Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%October2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
44.1%
48.5%
Portfolio components
NOVT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Novanta Inc. reported a gross profit of 113.58M and revenue of 257.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.1%.

RBC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, RBC Bearings Incorporated reported a gross profit of 251.00M and revenue of 518.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.5%.

NOVT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Novanta Inc. reported an operating income of 27.54M and revenue of 257.71M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.

RBC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, RBC Bearings Incorporated reported an operating income of 116.60M and revenue of 518.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.5%.

NOVT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Novanta Inc. reported a net income of 21.10M and revenue of 257.71M, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.

RBC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, RBC Bearings Incorporated reported a net income of 91.70M and revenue of 518.00M, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NOVT and RBC have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOVT has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to RBC (9.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOVT dropped -46.71% vs RBC's -71.79%.

RBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOVT and RBC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer