PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NORW vs. FDD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NORW vs. FDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW) and First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NORW achieves a 26.31% return, which is significantly higher than FDD's 11.53% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NORW having a 9.61% annualized return and FDD not far ahead at 9.96%.


NORW

1D
-0.52%
1M
-2.27%
YTD
26.31%
6M
31.64%
1Y
36.12%
3Y*
23.02%
5Y*
7.99%
10Y*
9.61%

FDD

1D
-1.17%
1M
3.51%
YTD
11.53%
6M
17.78%
1Y
33.02%
3Y*
25.85%
5Y*
11.03%
10Y*
9.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NORW vs. FDD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NORW
Global X MSCI Norway ETF
26.31%32.59%-2.50%5.03%-12.55%13.65%26.00%14.39%-10.39%24.03%
FDD
First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund
11.53%62.50%0.28%14.16%-16.14%16.03%-3.80%23.79%-8.98%19.07%

Correlation

The correlation between NORW and FDD is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2009

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between NORW and FDD has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

NORW vs. FDD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NORW
FDD

Energy

29.4%
10.8%

Financial Services

22.6%
52.2%

Industrials

13.3%
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

12.5%
3.7%

Basic Materials

10.9%
2.9%

Communication Services

5.9%
2.1%

Technology

4.1%

-

Utilities

0.7%
6.0%

Real Estate

0.4%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

0.2%
12.3%

Healthcare

-

-

Energy

NORW
29.4%
FDD
10.8%

Financial Services

NORW
22.6%
FDD
52.2%

Industrials

NORW
13.3%
FDD
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

NORW
12.5%
FDD
3.7%

Basic Materials

NORW
10.9%
FDD
2.9%

Communication Services

NORW
5.9%
FDD
2.1%

Technology

NORW
4.1%
FDD

-

Utilities

NORW
0.7%
FDD
6.0%

Real Estate

NORW
0.4%
FDD
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

NORW
0.2%
FDD
12.3%

Healthcare

NORW

-

FDD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NORW vs. FDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NORW
NORW Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
NORW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NORW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
NORW Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
NORW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NORW Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

FDD
FDD Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDD Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDD Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NORW vs. FDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW) and First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NORWFDDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.37

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.95

3.53

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.27

11.86

-0.60

NORW vs. FDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NORW Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the FDD Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NORW and FDD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NORWFDDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

2.16

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.60

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.50

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.10

+0.31

Drawdowns

NORW vs. FDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NORW drawdown since its inception was -35.62%, smaller than the maximum FDD drawdown of -74.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NORW and FDD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NORWFDDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.62%

-74.77%

+39.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.18%

-9.39%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.06%

-13.06%

-3.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.78%

-35.11%

+2.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.86%

-41.43%

+7.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.53%

-2.26%

-1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.13%

-35.47%

+25.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.21%

2.79%

+0.42%

Volatility

NORW vs. FDD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW) is 4.06%, while First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD) has a volatility of 5.22%. This indicates that NORW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NORWFDDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.06%

5.22%

-1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.73%

12.35%

+0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.70%

15.43%

+1.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.88%

18.39%

+3.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.80%

20.16%

+0.64%

NORW vs. FDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

NORW has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FDD's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

NORW vs. FDD - Dividend Comparison

NORW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, less than FDD's 3.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDD
First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund
3.55%3.99%7.65%6.85%6.07%3.44%4.01%4.69%5.05%2.78%4.88%4.35%
NORW
Global X MSCI Norway ETF
2.72%3.44%6.02%5.27%4.01%1.51%1.13%2.47%3.53%3.64%3.79%2.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


NORW and FDD have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDD has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to NORW (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NORW dropped -35.62% vs FDD's -74.77%.

On 10-year performance, FDD leads with 9.96% vs 9.61% for NORW. On fees, NORW is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, NORW has been the lower-risk option at 4.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FDD has performed better with a 9.96% return vs 9.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NORW is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for FDD.

FDD has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 2.72% for NORW.

NORW tracks MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index, while FDD tracks STOXX Europe Select Dividend 30. They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for NORW and 0.58% for FDD.

NORW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NORW and FDD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer