NOIEX vs. MGLBX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

NOIEX (Northern Income Equity Fund) and MGLBX (Marsico Global Fund) are both mutual funds - NOIEX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Northern Funds, while MGLBX is a Global Equities fund managed by Marsico Investment Fund. Over the past 10 years, NOIEX returned 13.92%/yr vs 20.66%/yr for MGLBX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NOIEX charges 0.49%/yr vs 1.45%/yr for MGLBX.

Performance

NOIEX vs. MGLBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Income Equity Fund (NOIEX) and Marsico Global Fund (MGLBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOIEX achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly lower than MGLBX's 19.65% return. Over the past 10 years, NOIEX has underperformed MGLBX with an annualized return of 13.92%, while MGLBX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.66% annualized return.

NOIEX

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: -0.67%
• YTD: 10.55%
• 6M: 9.65%
• 1Y: 26.75%
• 3Y*: 21.63%
• 5Y*: 13.80%
• 10Y*: 13.92%

MGLBX

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 5.74%
• YTD: 19.65%
• 6M: 18.51%
• 1Y: 31.52%
• 3Y*: 32.90%
• 5Y*: 13.92%
• 10Y*: 20.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOIEX vs. MGLBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NOIEX Northern Income Equity Fund	10.55%	18.81%	24.28%	19.56%	-13.34%	27.96%	11.03%	27.04%	-6.62%	20.22%
MGLBX Marsico Global Fund	19.65%	27.15%	40.57%	35.38%	-34.54%	10.96%	81.92%	27.18%	-4.50%	40.25%

Correlation

The correlation between NOIEX and MGLBX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2007	0.81

The correlation between NOIEX and MGLBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NOIEX vs. MGLBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOIEX

NOIEX Risk / Return Rank: 74
NOIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
NOIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
NOIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
NOIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
NOIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

MGLBX

MGLBX Risk / Return Rank: 38
MGLBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
MGLBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
MGLBX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
MGLBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
MGLBX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOIEX vs. MGLBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Income Equity Fund (NOIEX) and Marsico Global Fund (MGLBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NOIEX	MGLBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	1.59	+0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.15	2.28	+0.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.29	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.33	2.23	+1.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.64	9.17	+5.48

NOIEX vs. MGLBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOIEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the MGLBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOIEX and MGLBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NOIEX vs. MGLBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOIEX drawdown since its inception was -45.66%, smaller than the maximum MGLBX drawdown of -59.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOIEX and MGLBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NOIEX	MGLBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.66%	-59.60%	+13.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.39%	-14.92%	+6.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.06%	-20.66%	+2.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.89%	-43.08%	+21.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.31%	-43.08%	+7.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.99%	0.00%	-1.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.98%	-11.54%	+6.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.89%	3.63%	-1.74%

Volatility

NOIEX vs. MGLBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Northern Income Equity Fund (NOIEX) is 4.28%, while Marsico Global Fund (MGLBX) has a volatility of 8.42%. This indicates that NOIEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGLBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NOIEX	MGLBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.28%	8.42%	-4.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.48%	17.68%	-8.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.25%	20.98%	-8.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.42%	22.24%	-5.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.00%	23.18%	-5.18%

NOIEX vs. MGLBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOIEX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than MGLBX's 1.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

NOIEX vs. MGLBX - Dividend Comparison

NOIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.30%, less than MGLBX's 10.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MGLBX Marsico Global Fund	10.14%	12.13%	3.42%	1.98%	4.37%	17.97%	24.53%	0.00%	1.16%	9.25%	0.00%	11.04%
NOIEX Northern Income Equity Fund	7.30%	7.92%	6.11%	7.03%	5.44%	14.26%	7.67%	8.58%	15.73%	7.56%	3.02%	5.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NOIEX and MGLBX in my portfolio?

NOIEX and MGLBX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NOIEX or MGLBX?

MGLBX has higher volatility (8.42%) compared to NOIEX (4.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOIEX dropped -45.66% vs MGLBX's -59.60%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NOIEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.