MGLBX vs. FCNTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Marsico Global Fund (MGLBX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX).
MGLBX is managed by Marsico Investment Fund. It was launched on Jun 28, 2007. FCNTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 17, 1967.
Performance
MGLBX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MGLBX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGLBX Marsico Global Fund | -8.05% | 27.15% | 40.57% | 35.38% | -34.54% | 10.96% | 81.92% | 27.18% | -4.50% | 40.25% |
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund Fund | -8.57% | 21.76% | 36.00% | 38.67% | -28.31% | 24.52% | 32.48% | 30.00% | -3.81% | 32.18% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGLBX achieves a -8.05% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's -8.57% return. Over the past 10 years, MGLBX has outperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 17.17%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively lower 15.63% annualized return.
MGLBX
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- -14.07%
- YTD
- -8.05%
- 6M
- -9.54%
- 1Y
- 19.58%
- 3Y*
- 25.35%
- 5Y*
- 9.92%
- 10Y*
- 17.17%
FCNTX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -9.40%
- YTD
- -8.57%
- 6M
- -6.17%
- 1Y
- 16.04%
- 3Y*
- 23.48%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- 15.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MGLBX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGLBX has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MGLBX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank
MGLBX
FCNTX
MGLBX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marsico Global Fund (MGLBX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MGLBX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.86 | 0.83 | +0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.33 | 1.30 | +0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.18 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | 1.17 | -0.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.57 | 4.57 | 0.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MGLBX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 0.83 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.67 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.80 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.76 | -0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between MGLBX and FCNTX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MGLBX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison
MGLBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.19%, more than FCNTX's 5.10% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGLBX Marsico Global Fund | 13.19% | 12.13% | 3.42% | 1.98% | 4.37% | 17.97% | 24.53% | 0.00% | 1.16% | 9.25% | 0.00% | 11.04% |
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund Fund | 5.10% | 5.21% | 4.19% | 3.78% | 11.87% | 10.80% | 8.01% | 4.16% | 7.46% | 6.08% | 3.81% | 5.33% |
Drawdowns
MGLBX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGLBX drawdown since its inception was -59.60%, which is greater than FCNTX's maximum drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGLBX and FCNTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGLBX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.60% | -49.19% | -10.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.92% | -11.30% | -3.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.08% | -32.59% | -10.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.08% | -32.59% | -10.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.92% | -11.30% | -3.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.65% | -8.18% | -3.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | 2.90% | +0.66% |
Volatility
MGLBX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison
Marsico Global Fund (MGLBX) has a higher volatility of 7.80% compared to Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX) at 5.19%. This indicates that MGLBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MGLBX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.80% | 5.19% | +2.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.89% | 10.56% | +3.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.06% | 19.69% | +2.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.62% | 19.13% | +2.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.82% | 19.61% | +3.21% |