PortfoliosLab logo
MGLBX vs. FNCMX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MGLBX and FNCMX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

MGLBX vs. FNCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Marsico Global Fund (MGLBX) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

100.00%200.00%300.00%400.00%500.00%600.00%700.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
182.16%
642.48%
MGLBX
FNCMX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MGLBX:

1.00

FNCMX:

0.59

Sortino Ratio

MGLBX:

1.48

FNCMX:

0.98

Omega Ratio

MGLBX:

1.20

FNCMX:

1.14

Calmar Ratio

MGLBX:

1.11

FNCMX:

0.62

Martin Ratio

MGLBX:

4.29

FNCMX:

2.10

Ulcer Index

MGLBX:

5.80%

FNCMX:

7.16%

Daily Std Dev

MGLBX:

24.91%

FNCMX:

25.65%

Max Drawdown

MGLBX:

-59.43%

FNCMX:

-55.71%

Current Drawdown

MGLBX:

-3.80%

FNCMX:

-11.41%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGLBX achieves a 6.84% return, which is significantly higher than FNCMX's -7.45% return. Over the past 10 years, MGLBX has underperformed FNCMX with an annualized return of 7.13%, while FNCMX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.03% annualized return.


MGLBX

YTD

6.84%

1M

20.50%

6M

7.68%

1Y

20.08%

5Y*

9.00%

10Y*

7.13%

FNCMX

YTD

-7.45%

1M

14.47%

6M

-2.96%

1Y

9.81%

5Y*

15.77%

10Y*

14.03%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MGLBX vs. FNCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGLBX has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FNCMX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MGLBX vs. FNCMX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGLBX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MGLBX is 7777
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MGLBX is 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MGLBX is 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MGLBX is 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MGLBX is 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MGLBX is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

FNCMX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FNCMX is 5555
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FNCMX is 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FNCMX is 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FNCMX is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FNCMX is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FNCMX is 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MGLBX vs. FNCMX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marsico Global Fund (MGLBX) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MGLBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is higher than the FNCMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGLBX and FNCMX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.00
0.59
MGLBX
FNCMX

Dividends

MGLBX vs. FNCMX - Dividend Comparison

MGLBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, more than FNCMX's 0.65% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MGLBX
Marsico Global Fund
1.60%1.71%1.98%4.37%17.97%2.45%0.00%1.16%9.25%0.00%11.04%12.83%
FNCMX
Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund
0.65%0.61%0.67%0.88%0.47%0.67%0.97%0.94%0.70%0.91%0.89%0.80%

Drawdowns

MGLBX vs. FNCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGLBX drawdown since its inception was -59.43%, which is greater than FNCMX's maximum drawdown of -55.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGLBX and FNCMX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-3.80%
-11.41%
MGLBX
FNCMX

Volatility

MGLBX vs. FNCMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Marsico Global Fund (MGLBX) is 14.03%, while Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX) has a volatility of 15.79%. This indicates that MGLBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
14.03%
15.79%
MGLBX
FNCMX