PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOIEX vs. PRDGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOIEX vs. PRDGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Income Equity Fund (NOIEX) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOIEX achieves a 12.36% return, which is significantly higher than PRDGX's 6.75% return. Over the past 10 years, NOIEX has outperformed PRDGX with an annualized return of 13.98%, while PRDGX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.78% annualized return.


NOIEX

1D
0.15%
1M
4.98%
YTD
12.36%
6M
13.15%
1Y
31.03%
3Y*
22.76%
5Y*
14.11%
10Y*
13.98%

PRDGX

1D
-0.31%
1M
1.63%
YTD
6.75%
6M
7.44%
1Y
16.67%
3Y*
15.24%
5Y*
9.87%
10Y*
12.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOIEX vs. PRDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOIEX
Northern Income Equity Fund
12.36%18.81%24.28%19.56%-13.34%27.96%11.03%27.04%-6.62%20.22%
PRDGX
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc.
6.75%14.74%13.48%13.68%-10.22%26.03%13.92%31.76%-1.06%18.89%

Correlation

The correlation between NOIEX and PRDGX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 1994

0.87

The correlation between NOIEX and PRDGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.91 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOIEX vs. PRDGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOIEX
NOIEX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
NOIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
NOIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

PRDGX
PRDGX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
PRDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
PRDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOIEX vs. PRDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Income Equity Fund (NOIEX) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NOIEXPRDGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.74

1.76

+0.99

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.79

2.51

+1.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.31

+0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.94

2.37

+1.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.13

9.72

+8.40

NOIEX vs. PRDGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOIEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is higher than the PRDGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOIEX and PRDGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NOIEXPRDGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.74

1.76

+0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.71

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.81

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.66

+0.03

Drawdowns

NOIEX vs. PRDGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOIEX drawdown since its inception was -45.66%, smaller than the maximum PRDGX drawdown of -49.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOIEX and PRDGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOIEXPRDGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.66%

-49.79%

+4.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.39%

-7.34%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.06%

-14.15%

-3.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.89%

-19.31%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.31%

-33.18%

-2.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.31%

+0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.99%

-5.42%

+0.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

1.79%

+0.03%

Volatility

NOIEX vs. PRDGX - Volatility Comparison

Northern Income Equity Fund (NOIEX) has a higher volatility of 2.73% compared to T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX) at 2.26%. This indicates that NOIEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOIEXPRDGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.73%

2.26%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.74%

7.54%

+1.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.80%

9.71%

+2.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.36%

14.06%

+2.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.96%

15.88%

+2.08%

NOIEX vs. PRDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOIEX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than PRDGX's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOIEX vs. PRDGX - Dividend Comparison

NOIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.18%, less than PRDGX's 7.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOIEX
Northern Income Equity Fund
7.18%7.92%6.11%7.03%5.44%14.26%7.67%8.58%15.73%7.56%3.02%5.57%
PRDGX
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc.
7.58%8.02%4.66%2.78%3.81%2.00%1.03%2.33%3.67%1.82%3.07%7.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOIEX and PRDGX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOIEX has higher volatility (2.73%) compared to PRDGX (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOIEX dropped -45.66% vs PRDGX's -49.79%.

NOIEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOIEX and PRDGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer