NOCBX vs. NUSFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Northern Core Bond Fund (NOCBX) and Northern Ultra-Short Fixed Income Fund (NUSFX).
NOCBX is managed by Northern Funds. It was launched on Mar 29, 2001. NUSFX is managed by Northern Funds. It was launched on Jun 18, 2009.
Performance
NOCBX vs. NUSFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NOCBX vs. NUSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOCBX Northern Core Bond Fund | -0.09% | 6.17% | 1.10% | 5.07% | -14.51% | -1.62% | 7.32% | 9.76% | -1.03% | 4.05% |
NUSFX Northern Ultra-Short Fixed Income Fund | 0.84% | 4.27% | 5.22% | 5.21% | -1.59% | -0.17% | 2.34% | 3.68% | 1.51% | 1.53% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NOCBX achieves a -0.09% return, which is significantly lower than NUSFX's 0.84% return. Over the past 10 years, NOCBX has underperformed NUSFX with an annualized return of 1.31%, while NUSFX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.36% annualized return.
NOCBX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.22%
- YTD
- -0.09%
- 6M
- 0.56%
- 1Y
- 4.17%
- 3Y*
- 2.94%
- 5Y*
- -0.45%
- 10Y*
- 1.31%
NUSFX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- 0.84%
- 6M
- 1.91%
- 1Y
- 4.56%
- 3Y*
- 4.70%
- 5Y*
- 2.70%
- 10Y*
- 2.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NOCBX vs. NUSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NOCBX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than NUSFX's 0.28% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NOCBX vs. NUSFX — Risk / Return Rank
NOCBX
NUSFX
NOCBX vs. NUSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Core Bond Fund (NOCBX) and Northern Ultra-Short Fixed Income Fund (NUSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NOCBX | NUSFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.93 | 2.98 | -2.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.38 | 6.75 | -5.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 2.85 | -1.67 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 5.24 | -3.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.48 | 38.53 | -33.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NOCBX | NUSFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 2.98 | -2.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | 2.09 | -2.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 1.96 | -1.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 1.78 | -1.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between NOCBX and NUSFX is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
NOCBX vs. NUSFX - Dividend Comparison
NOCBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, less than NUSFX's 4.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOCBX Northern Core Bond Fund | 4.32% | 3.14% | 3.82% | 2.99% | 1.66% | 1.56% | 3.58% | 2.75% | 3.16% | 2.88% | 2.05% | 3.09% |
NUSFX Northern Ultra-Short Fixed Income Fund | 4.56% | 3.78% | 4.09% | 2.86% | 0.97% | 0.71% | 1.52% | 2.42% | 2.09% | 1.42% | 1.07% | 0.85% |
Drawdowns
NOCBX vs. NUSFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOCBX drawdown since its inception was -20.02%, which is greater than NUSFX's maximum drawdown of -3.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOCBX and NUSFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NOCBX | NUSFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.02% | -3.88% | -16.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.89% | -0.87% | -2.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.95% | -3.35% | -16.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.02% | -3.88% | -16.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.24% | 0.00% | -5.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.90% | -0.24% | -2.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | 0.12% | +0.81% |
Volatility
NOCBX vs. NUSFX - Volatility Comparison
Northern Core Bond Fund (NOCBX) has a higher volatility of 1.38% compared to Northern Ultra-Short Fixed Income Fund (NUSFX) at 0.39%. This indicates that NOCBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUSFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NOCBX | NUSFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.38% | 0.39% | +0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.73% | 0.97% | +1.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.44% | 1.54% | +2.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.10% | 1.30% | +4.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.05% | 1.21% | +3.84% |