PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOC vs. TKAMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NOC vs. TKAMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) and Thyssenkrupp AG ADR (TKAMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOC achieves a -2.75% return, which is significantly lower than TKAMY's 23.42% return.


NOC

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.17%
YTD
-2.75%
6M
-2.67%
1Y
12.44%
3Y*
8.64%
5Y*
9.73%
10Y*
11.53%

TKAMY

1D
1.57%
1M
7.29%
YTD
23.42%
6M
27.67%
1Y
37.41%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
3.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOC vs. TKAMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOC
Northrop Grumman Corporation
-2.75%23.61%1.93%-12.79%43.02%29.29%-9.92%42.69%-18.95%9.80%
TKAMY
Thyssenkrupp AG ADR
23.42%175.88%-40.20%18.03%-44.90%11.12%-26.67%-21.38%-40.96%-2.14%

Correlation

The correlation between NOC and TKAMY is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2017

0.10

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NOC:

$78.42B

TKAMY:

$8.19B

EPS

NOC:

$31.95

TKAMY:

€0.10

PE Ratio

NOC:

17.22

TKAMY:

116.61

PEG Ratio

NOC:

2.54

TKAMY:

2.02

PS Ratio

NOC:

1.86

TKAMY:

0.22

PB Ratio

NOC:

4.58

TKAMY:

0.77

Total Revenue (TTM)

NOC:

$42.37B

TKAMY:

€32.06B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NOC:

$8.69B

TKAMY:

€3.66B

EBITDA (TTM)

NOC:

$7.50B

TKAMY:

€2.18B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOC vs. TKAMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOC
NOC Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
NOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOC Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
NOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOC Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

TKAMY
TKAMY Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
TKAMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TKAMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
TKAMY Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
TKAMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
TKAMY Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOC vs. TKAMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) and Thyssenkrupp AG ADR (TKAMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NOCTKAMYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.16

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.40

0.77

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.02

1.61

-0.59

NOC vs. TKAMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOC Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is comparable to the TKAMY Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOC and TKAMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOC vs. TKAMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOC drawdown since its inception was -71.12%, smaller than the maximum TKAMY drawdown of -90.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOC and TKAMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOCTKAMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.12%

-90.08%

+18.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.20%

-48.64%

+17.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.20%

-61.74%

+30.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.20%

-73.76%

+42.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.03%

-55.95%

+27.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.40%

-63.90%

+45.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.25%

23.37%

-11.12%

Volatility

NOC vs. TKAMY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) is 7.39%, while Thyssenkrupp AG ADR (TKAMY) has a volatility of 12.79%. This indicates that NOC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TKAMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOCTKAMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.39%

12.79%

-5.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.25%

42.84%

-21.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.55%

63.49%

-36.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.28%

54.78%

-29.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.42%

55.16%

-29.74%

Dividends

NOC vs. TKAMY - Dividend Comparison

NOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, more than TKAMY's 1.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOC
Northrop Grumman Corporation
1.71%1.58%1.72%1.57%1.24%1.59%1.86%1.50%1.92%1.27%1.50%1.64%
TKAMY
Thyssenkrupp AG ADR
1.33%1.44%4.04%2.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.81%0.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NOC vs. TKAMY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Northrop Grumman Corporation and Thyssenkrupp AG ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


7.00B8.00B9.00B10.00B11.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
9.88B
8.52B
(NOC) Total Revenue
(TKAMY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. NOC values in USD, TKAMY values in EUR

NOC vs. TKAMY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Northrop Grumman Corporation and Thyssenkrupp AG ADR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-10.0%-5.0%0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%20222023202420252026
19.8%
13.0%
Portfolio components
NOC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Northrop Grumman Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.96B and revenue of 9.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.8%.

TKAMY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Thyssenkrupp AG ADR reported a gross profit of 1.11B and revenue of 8.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.0%.

NOC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Northrop Grumman Corporation reported an operating income of 989.00M and revenue of 9.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.

TKAMY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Thyssenkrupp AG ADR reported an operating income of 94.53M and revenue of 8.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.1%.

NOC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Northrop Grumman Corporation reported a net income of 875.00M and revenue of 9.88B, resulting in a net margin of 8.9%.

TKAMY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Thyssenkrupp AG ADR reported a net income of 1.02M and revenue of 8.52B, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NOC and TKAMY have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TKAMY has higher volatility (12.79%) compared to NOC (7.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOC dropped -71.12% vs TKAMY's -90.08%.

TKAMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOC and TKAMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer