NNE vs. SSRM
NNE (NANO Nuclear Energy Inc.) and SSRM (SSR Mining Inc.) are both stocks. NNE operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while SSRM operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past year, NNE returned -28.21% vs 119.07% for SSRM. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NNE vs. SSRM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NNE achieves a -3.46% return, which is significantly lower than SSRM's 24.22% return.
NNE
- 1D
- -1.57%
- 1M
- -14.31%
- YTD
- -3.46%
- 6M
- -34.54%
- 1Y
- -28.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SSRM
- 1D
- 3.46%
- 1M
- -21.64%
- YTD
- 24.22%
- 6M
- 22.60%
- 1Y
- 119.07%
- 3Y*
- 25.15%
- 5Y*
- 9.84%
- 10Y*
- 9.58%
NNE vs. SSRM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NNE NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. | -3.46% | -3.55% | 591.53% |
SSRM SSR Mining Inc. | 24.22% | 214.94% | 27.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between NNE and SSRM is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2024 | 0.22 |
Fundamentals
NNE:
$1.20B
SSRM:
$5.93B
NNE:
-$202.05
SSRM:
$3.27
NNE:
0.00
SSRM:
1.34
NNE:
$0.00
SSRM:
$1.90B
NNE:
-$769.48K
SSRM:
$643.76M
NNE:
$14.05B
SSRM:
$835.27M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NNE vs. SSRM — Risk / Return Rank
NNE
SSRM
NNE vs. SSRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. (NNE) and SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NNE | SSRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.30 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | 3.83 | -4.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.69 | 9.89 | -10.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NNE vs. SSRM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NNE drawdown since its inception was -77.68%, smaller than the maximum SSRM drawdown of -91.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NNE and SSRM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NNE | SSRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.68% | -91.68% | +14.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -66.45% | -31.28% | -35.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -73.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -83.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -83.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.07% | -37.45% | -21.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.18% | -57.15% | +20.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 41.10% | 12.09% | +29.01% |
Volatility
NNE vs. SSRM - Volatility Comparison
NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. (NNE) has a higher volatility of 32.64% compared to SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) at 19.31%. This indicates that NNE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NNE | SSRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.64% | 19.31% | +13.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 69.31% | 54.27% | +15.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 98.66% | 66.63% | +32.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 151.27% | 55.93% | +95.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 151.27% | 52.96% | +98.31% |
Dividends
NNE vs. SSRM - Dividend Comparison
Neither NNE nor SSRM has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NNE NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSRM SSR Mining Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.60% | 1.79% | 1.13% |
Financials
NNE vs. SSRM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. and SSR Mining Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
NNE and SSRM have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NNE has higher volatility (32.64%) compared to SSRM (19.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NNE dropped -77.68% vs SSRM's -91.68%.
SSRM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NNE and SSRM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer