NNE vs. CEG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. (NNE) and Constellation Energy Corp (CEG).

Performance

NNE vs. CEG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. (NNE) and Constellation Energy Corp (CEG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NNE vs. CEG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NNE NANO Nuclear Energy Inc.	-14.70%	-3.55%	379.67%
CEG Constellation Energy Corp	-20.85%	58.80%	8.09%

Fundamentals

Market Cap NNE : $1.02B CEG : $87.68B
EPS NNE : -$150.61 CEG : $7.39
PB Ratio NNE : 0.00 CEG : 6.04
Total Revenue (TTM) NNE : $0.00 CEG : $26.15B
Gross Profit (TTM) NNE : -$586.84K CEG : -$3.91B
EBITDA (TTM) NNE : $11.52B CEG : $3.98B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NNE achieves a -14.70% return, which is significantly higher than CEG's -20.85% return.

NNE

• 1D: 7.79%
• 1M: -22.98%
• YTD: -14.70%
• 6M: -46.89%
• 1Y: -22.60%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CEG

• 1D: -6.48%
• 1M: -15.23%
• YTD: -20.85%
• 6M: -14.93%
• 1Y: 39.20%
• 3Y*: 53.80%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

NNE vs. CEG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NNE

NNE Risk / Return Rank: 34
NNE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
NNE Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
NNE Omega Ratio Rank: 37
NNE Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
NNE Martin Ratio Rank: 31

CEG

CEG Risk / Return Rank: 65
CEG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
CEG Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
CEG Omega Ratio Rank: 63
CEG Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
CEG Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NNE vs. CEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. (NNE) and Constellation Energy Corp (CEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NNE	CEG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.23	0.76	-0.99
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.33	1.32	-1.00
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.17	-0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.35	0.95	-1.30
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.71	2.57	-3.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NNE vs. CEG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NNE Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the CEG Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NNE and CEG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NNE	CEG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.23	0.76	-0.99
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.71	1.03	-0.32

Correlation

The correlation between NNE and CEG is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

NNE vs. CEG - Dividend Comparison

NNE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CEG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
NNE NANO Nuclear Energy Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CEG Constellation Energy Corp	0.57%	0.44%	0.63%	0.97%	0.65%

Drawdowns

NNE vs. CEG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NNE drawdown since its inception was -77.68%, which is greater than CEG's maximum drawdown of -50.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NNE and CEG.

Drawdown Indicators

	NNE	CEG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.68%	-50.70%	-26.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-66.45%	-38.77%	-27.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-63.84%	-30.70%	-33.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.12%	-10.82%	-23.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	32.96%	14.27%	+18.69%

Volatility

NNE vs. CEG - Volatility Comparison

NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. (NNE) and Constellation Energy Corp (CEG) have volatilities of 17.51% and 16.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NNE	CEG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.51%	16.75%	+0.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	66.58%	36.99%	+29.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	96.82%	51.89%	+44.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	151.50%	49.33%	+102.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	151.50%	49.33%	+102.17%

Financials