NML vs. NMUIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Neuberger Berman MLP (NML) and Neuberger Berman Municipal Intermediate Bond Fund (NMUIX).
NML is an actively managed fund by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on Mar 26, 2013. NMUIX is managed by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on Jul 8, 1987.
Performance
NML vs. NMUIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NML vs. NMUIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NML Neuberger Berman MLP | 25.95% | 4.36% | 40.55% | 14.61% | 32.75% | 61.76% | -45.84% | 10.60% | -23.02% | 7.07% |
NMUIX Neuberger Berman Municipal Intermediate Bond Fund | -0.34% | 5.31% | 2.19% | 5.14% | -9.87% | 1.46% | 3.82% | 6.76% | 0.94% | 3.93% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NML achieves a 25.95% return, which is significantly higher than NMUIX's -0.34% return. Over the past 10 years, NML has outperformed NMUIX with an annualized return of 12.90%, while NMUIX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.68% annualized return.
NML
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 3.44%
- YTD
- 25.95%
- 6M
- 25.36%
- 1Y
- 26.49%
- 3Y*
- 27.91%
- 5Y*
- 28.84%
- 10Y*
- 12.90%
NMUIX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -2.31%
- YTD
- -0.34%
- 6M
- 0.83%
- 1Y
- 4.06%
- 3Y*
- 3.25%
- 5Y*
- 0.64%
- 10Y*
- 1.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NML vs. NMUIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NML has a 2.72% expense ratio, which is higher than NMUIX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NML vs. NMUIX — Risk / Return Rank
NML
NMUIX
NML vs. NMUIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman MLP (NML) and Neuberger Berman Municipal Intermediate Bond Fund (NMUIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NML | NMUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.22 | 1.38 | -0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.60 | 1.87 | -0.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.40 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 1.37 | +0.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.64 | 5.57 | +0.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NML | NMUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22 | 1.38 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.21 | 0.20 | +1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.49 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 1.24 | -1.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between NML and NMUIX is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
NML vs. NMUIX - Dividend Comparison
NML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.67%, more than NMUIX's 2.87% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NML Neuberger Berman MLP | 6.67% | 8.24% | 7.94% | 10.19% | 4.26% | 3.54% | 8.33% | 9.76% | 9.87% | 7.04% | 8.63% | 15.44% |
NMUIX Neuberger Berman Municipal Intermediate Bond Fund | 2.87% | 3.75% | 3.17% | 2.03% | 1.58% | 2.37% | 2.32% | 2.80% | 2.38% | 2.31% | 2.65% | 2.54% |
Drawdowns
NML vs. NMUIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NML drawdown since its inception was -90.48%, which is greater than NMUIX's maximum drawdown of -13.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NML and NMUIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NML | NMUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.48% | -13.85% | -76.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.72% | -3.46% | -12.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.40% | -13.85% | -7.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.84% | -13.85% | -70.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -2.31% | +1.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.54% | -1.63% | -35.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.62% | 0.85% | +3.77% |
Volatility
NML vs. NMUIX - Volatility Comparison
Neuberger Berman MLP (NML) has a higher volatility of 4.14% compared to Neuberger Berman Municipal Intermediate Bond Fund (NMUIX) at 0.95%. This indicates that NML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NMUIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NML | NMUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.14% | 0.95% | +3.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.52% | 1.45% | +11.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.79% | 3.56% | +18.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.88% | 3.15% | +20.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.35% | 3.41% | +31.94% |