NMUIX vs. GILHX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

NMUIX (Neuberger Berman Municipal Intermediate Bond Fund) and GILHX (Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund) are both mutual funds - NMUIX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Neuberger Berman, while GILHX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Guggenheim. Over the past 10 years, NMUIX returned 1.78%/yr vs 3.09%/yr for GILHX. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NMUIX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for GILHX.

Performance

NMUIX vs. GILHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Municipal Intermediate Bond Fund (NMUIX) and Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund (GILHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMUIX achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly higher than GILHX's 0.98% return. Over the past 10 years, NMUIX has underperformed GILHX with an annualized return of 1.78%, while GILHX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.09% annualized return.

NMUIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.43%
• YTD: 1.42%
• 6M: 1.75%
• 1Y: 6.00%
• 3Y*: 4.03%
• 5Y*: 0.72%
• 10Y*: 1.78%

GILHX

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 0.11%
• YTD: 0.98%
• 6M: 1.47%
• 1Y: 4.69%
• 3Y*: 5.84%
• 5Y*: 3.00%
• 10Y*: 3.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NMUIX vs. GILHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NMUIX Neuberger Berman Municipal Intermediate Bond Fund	1.42%	5.31%	2.19%	5.14%	-9.87%	1.46%	3.82%	6.76%	0.94%	3.93%
GILHX Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund	0.98%	6.02%	6.00%	7.28%	-4.90%	0.00%	6.51%	2.21%	1.66%	2.91%

Correlation

The correlation between NMUIX and GILHX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014	0.43

The correlation between NMUIX and GILHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.59 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NMUIX vs. GILHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMUIX

NMUIX Risk / Return Rank: 71
NMUIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
NMUIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
NMUIX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
NMUIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
NMUIX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

GILHX

GILHX Risk / Return Rank: 88
GILHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
GILHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
GILHX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
GILHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
GILHX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMUIX vs. GILHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Municipal Intermediate Bond Fund (NMUIX) and Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund (GILHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NMUIX	GILHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.73	2.50	+0.23
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.30	5.17	-0.87
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.74	1.63	+0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.57	4.62	-2.05
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.86	20.47	-11.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NMUIX vs. GILHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMUIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is comparable to the GILHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMUIX and GILHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NMUIX	GILHX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.73	2.50	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23	1.35	-1.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	1.68	-1.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.25	1.68	-0.44

Drawdowns

NMUIX vs. GILHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMUIX drawdown since its inception was -13.85%, which is greater than GILHX's maximum drawdown of -8.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMUIX and GILHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NMUIX	GILHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.85%	-8.10%	-5.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.40%	-1.13%	-1.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.44%	-1.13%	-3.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.85%	-8.10%	-5.75%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-13.85%	-8.10%	-5.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.59%	-0.08%	-0.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.62%	-0.70%	-0.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.69%	0.26%	+0.43%

Volatility

NMUIX vs. GILHX - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Municipal Intermediate Bond Fund (NMUIX) has a higher volatility of 0.86% compared to Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund (GILHX) at 0.60%. This indicates that NMUIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GILHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NMUIX	GILHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.86%	0.60%	+0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.77%	1.36%	+0.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.18%	1.88%	+0.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.19%	2.23%	+0.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.43%	1.85%	+1.58%

NMUIX vs. GILHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMUIX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than GILHX's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

NMUIX vs. GILHX - Dividend Comparison

NMUIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, less than GILHX's 4.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GILHX Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund	4.56%	4.43%	4.38%	4.31%	2.05%	1.79%	2.25%	2.31%	2.35%	2.39%	3.07%	3.54%
NMUIX Neuberger Berman Municipal Intermediate Bond Fund	2.88%	3.75%	3.17%	2.03%	1.58%	2.37%	2.32%	2.80%	2.38%	2.31%	2.65%	2.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NMUIX and GILHX in my portfolio?

NMUIX and GILHX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NMUIX or GILHX?

NMUIX has higher volatility (0.86%) compared to GILHX (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMUIX dropped -13.85% vs GILHX's -8.10%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NMUIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.