NML vs. MLPFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Neuberger Berman MLP (NML) and Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 Fund Class A (MLPFX).
NML is an actively managed fund by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on Mar 26, 2013. MLPFX is an actively managed fund by Invesco. It was launched on Mar 31, 2010.
Performance
NML vs. MLPFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NML vs. MLPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NML Neuberger Berman MLP | 25.95% | 4.36% | 40.55% | 14.61% | 32.75% | 61.76% | -45.84% | 10.60% | -23.02% | 7.07% |
MLPFX Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 Fund Class A | 20.14% | 8.22% | 29.99% | 22.47% | 21.84% | 39.44% | -25.43% | 6.90% | -9.63% | -4.02% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NML achieves a 25.95% return, which is significantly higher than MLPFX's 20.14% return. Over the past 10 years, NML has outperformed MLPFX with an annualized return of 12.90%, while MLPFX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.36% annualized return.
NML
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 3.44%
- YTD
- 25.95%
- 6M
- 25.36%
- 1Y
- 26.49%
- 3Y*
- 27.91%
- 5Y*
- 28.84%
- 10Y*
- 12.90%
MLPFX
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- 20.14%
- 6M
- 22.49%
- 1Y
- 19.91%
- 3Y*
- 26.35%
- 5Y*
- 24.42%
- 10Y*
- 11.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NML vs. MLPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NML has a 2.72% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPFX's 10.29% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NML vs. MLPFX — Risk / Return Rank
NML
MLPFX
NML vs. MLPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman MLP (NML) and Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 Fund Class A (MLPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NML | MLPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.22 | 1.17 | +0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.60 | 1.53 | +0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.24 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 1.31 | +0.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.64 | 3.91 | +1.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NML | MLPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22 | 1.17 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.21 | 1.37 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.46 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 0.37 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between NML and MLPFX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NML vs. MLPFX - Dividend Comparison
NML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.67%, more than MLPFX's 5.25% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NML Neuberger Berman MLP | 6.67% | 8.24% | 7.94% | 10.19% | 4.26% | 3.54% | 8.33% | 9.76% | 9.87% | 7.04% | 8.63% | 15.44% |
MLPFX Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 Fund Class A | 5.25% | 6.11% | 5.29% | 6.54% | 7.34% | 8.29% | 13.36% | 10.42% | 10.09% | 8.35% | 7.41% | 7.84% |
Drawdowns
NML vs. MLPFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NML drawdown since its inception was -90.48%, which is greater than MLPFX's maximum drawdown of -76.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NML and MLPFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NML | MLPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.48% | -76.01% | -14.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.72% | -14.55% | -1.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.40% | -18.81% | -2.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.84% | -72.18% | -12.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -1.39% | +0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.54% | -13.20% | -24.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.62% | 4.86% | -0.24% |
Volatility
NML vs. MLPFX - Volatility Comparison
Neuberger Berman MLP (NML) has a higher volatility of 4.14% compared to Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 Fund Class A (MLPFX) at 3.71%. This indicates that NML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NML | MLPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.14% | 3.71% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.52% | 8.67% | +3.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.79% | 16.92% | +4.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.88% | 17.90% | +5.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.35% | 25.08% | +10.27% |