PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPFX vs. MLPLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPFX vs. MLPLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 Fund Class A (MLPFX) and Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund Class A (MLPLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPFX achieves a 25.13% return, which is significantly lower than MLPLX's 30.97% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPFX has outperformed MLPLX with an annualized return of 10.44%, while MLPLX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.46% annualized return.


MLPFX

1D
0.55%
1M
2.53%
6M
15.87%
YTD
25.13%
1Y
29.05%
3Y*
24.26%
5Y*
22.44%
10Y*
10.44%
ALL TIME*
8.28%

MLPLX

1D
0.27%
1M
4.79%
6M
20.54%
YTD
30.97%
1Y
32.27%
3Y*
29.36%
5Y*
29.67%
10Y*
9.46%
ALL TIME*
6.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MLPFX vs. MLPLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLPFX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 Fund Class A
25.13%8.22%29.99%22.47%21.84%39.44%-25.43%6.90%-9.63%-4.02%
MLPLX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund Class A
30.97%4.36%47.10%25.02%38.31%55.18%-46.03%8.79%-21.09%-11.18%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPFX and MLPLX is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2011

0.96

The correlation between MLPFX and MLPLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPFX vs. MLPLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MLPFX
MLPFX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
MLPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

MLPLX
MLPLX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
MLPLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPLX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MLPFX vs. MLPLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 Fund Class A (MLPFX) and Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund Class A (MLPLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MLPFXMLPLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.32

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.92

3.60

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.91

8.82

+2.09

MLPFX vs. MLPLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the MLPLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPFX and MLPLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MLPFX vs. MLPLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPFX drawdown since its inception was -76.01%, smaller than the maximum MLPLX drawdown of -88.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPFX and MLPLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPFXMLPLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.01%

-88.76%

+12.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.40%

-8.56%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.55%

-19.55%

+5.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.81%

-27.21%

+8.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.18%

-85.02%

+12.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.16%

-1.96%

-1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.99%

-28.71%

+15.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

3.60%

-0.95%

Volatility

MLPFX vs. MLPLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 Fund Class A (MLPFX) is 4.55%, while Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund Class A (MLPLX) has a volatility of 5.52%. This indicates that MLPFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLPLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPFXMLPLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.55%

5.52%

-0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.16%

12.92%

-2.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.08%

16.69%

-3.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.54%

24.65%

-7.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.08%

35.44%

-10.36%

MLPFX vs. MLPLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPFX has a 10.29% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPLX's 17.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLPFX vs. MLPLX - Dividend Comparison

MLPFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.24%, more than MLPLX's 4.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLPFX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 Fund Class A
5.24%6.11%5.29%6.54%7.34%8.29%13.36%10.42%10.09%8.35%7.41%7.84%
MLPLX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund Class A
4.83%5.70%4.42%5.92%6.79%8.75%22.54%14.33%13.67%9.68%7.88%9.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, MLPFX and MLPLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MLPLX has higher volatility (5.52%) compared to MLPFX (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPFX dropped -76.01% vs MLPLX's -88.76%.

MLPFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPFX and MLPLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer