NMBL vs. KEAT
NMBL (NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF) and KEAT (Keating Active ETF) are both Global Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NMBL charges 1.99%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for KEAT.
Performance
NMBL vs. KEAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NMBL achieves a 2.87% return, which is significantly lower than KEAT's 3.71% return.
NMBL
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- -1.44%
- YTD
- 2.87%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KEAT
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- -6.30%
- YTD
- 3.71%
- 6M
- 2.92%
- 1Y
- 17.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NMBL vs. KEAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NMBL NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF | 2.87% | -0.27% |
KEAT Keating Active ETF | 3.71% | 5.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between NMBL and KEAT is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NMBL vs. KEAT — Risk / Return Rank
NMBL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KEAT
NMBL vs. KEAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF (NMBL) and Keating Active ETF (KEAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NMBL | KEAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.72 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.40 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NMBL vs. KEAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NMBL drawdown since its inception was -8.05%, smaller than the maximum KEAT drawdown of -10.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMBL and KEAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NMBL | KEAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.05% | -10.53% | +2.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.40% | -10.53% | +6.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.05% | -1.72% | -0.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.82% | — |
Volatility
NMBL vs. KEAT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NMBL | KEAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.62% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.90% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.43% | 10.81% | +2.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.43% | 10.43% | +3.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.43% | 10.43% | +3.00% |
NMBL vs. KEAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
NMBL has a 1.99% expense ratio, which is higher than KEAT's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
NMBL vs. KEAT - Dividend Comparison
NMBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than KEAT's 2.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
KEAT Keating Active ETF | 2.37% | 2.48% | 1.72% |
NMBL NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF | 0.90% | 0.93% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NMBL and KEAT have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KEAT is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KEAT is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.99% for NMBL.
KEAT has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 0.90% for NMBL.
They also come from different issuers: NovaTide and Keating. Their fees differ too: 1.99% for NMBL and 0.85% for KEAT.
Find the right allocation for NMBL and KEAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer