NMANX vs. NEEGX

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

NMANX (Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund) and NEEGX (Needham Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, NMANX returned 11.55%/yr vs 14.38%/yr for NEEGX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NMANX charges 0.83%/yr vs 1.78%/yr for NEEGX.

Performance

NMANX vs. NEEGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund (NMANX) and Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMANX achieves a 3.41% return, which is significantly lower than NEEGX's 40.35% return. Over the past 10 years, NMANX has underperformed NEEGX with an annualized return of 11.55%, while NEEGX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.38% annualized return.

NMANX

• 1D: -1.49%
• 1M: -4.95%
• 6M: -2.26%
• YTD: 3.41%
• 1Y: -1.37%
• 3Y*: 11.15%
• 5Y*: 3.66%
• 10Y*: 11.55%

NEEGX

• 1D: -2.93%
• 1M: -10.08%
• 6M: 21.74%
• YTD: 40.35%
• 1Y: 55.49%
• 3Y*: 19.96%
• 5Y*: 10.99%
• 10Y*: 14.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NMANX vs. NEEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NMANX Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund	3.41%	5.51%	24.39%	18.21%	-28.82%	12.42%	39.45%	33.62%	-6.28%	29.01%
NEEGX Needham Growth Fund	40.35%	8.76%	14.45%	26.85%	-33.57%	27.63%	41.73%	42.33%	-10.56%	8.33%

Correlation

The correlation between NMANX and NEEGX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 26, 1995	0.84

The correlation between NMANX and NEEGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NMANX vs. NEEGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMANX

NMANX Risk / Return Rank: 3
NMANX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
NMANX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
NMANX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
NMANX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
NMANX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

NEEGX

NEEGX Risk / Return Rank: 68
NEEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
NEEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
NEEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
NEEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
NEEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMANX vs. NEEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund (NMANX) and Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NMANX	NEEGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.02	1.86	-1.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.12	2.36	-2.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.31	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.03	3.83	-3.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.08	12.35	-12.43

NMANX vs. NEEGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMANX Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the NEEGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMANX and NEEGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NMANX vs. NEEGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMANX drawdown since its inception was -72.14%, which is greater than NEEGX's maximum drawdown of -53.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMANX and NEEGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NMANX	NEEGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.14%	-53.60%	-18.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.71%	-15.11%	-2.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.93%	-38.66%	+12.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.10%	-43.35%	+5.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.10%	-43.35%	+5.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.62%	-15.11%	+7.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.37%	-10.87%	-6.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.18%	4.67%	+1.51%

Volatility

NMANX vs. NEEGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund (NMANX) is 6.57%, while Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX) has a volatility of 13.42%. This indicates that NMANX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NMANX	NEEGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.57%	13.42%	-6.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.45%	25.54%	-8.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.94%	31.15%	-9.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.50%	29.19%	-5.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.55%	25.73%	-3.18%

NMANX vs. NEEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMANX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than NEEGX's 1.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

NMANX vs. NEEGX - Dividend Comparison

NMANX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.33%, more than NEEGX's 5.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NEEGX Needham Growth Fund	5.39%	7.57%	3.92%	0.00%	1.78%	6.92%	5.73%	11.31%	17.79%	9.70%	4.22%	6.74%
NMANX Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund	22.33%	23.10%	9.85%	3.19%	4.87%	16.30%	9.58%	5.43%	11.70%	8.94%	5.00%	9.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NMANX and NEEGX in my portfolio?

NMANX and NEEGX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NMANX or NEEGX?

NEEGX has higher volatility (13.42%) compared to NMANX (6.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMANX dropped -72.14% vs NEEGX's -53.60%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NEEGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.