NEEGX vs. NEAGX
NEEGX (Needham Growth Fund) and NEAGX (Needham Aggressive Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - NEEGX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Needham, while NEAGX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Needham. Over the past 10 years, NEEGX returned 17.07%/yr vs 22.99%/yr for NEAGX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NEEGX charges 1.78%/yr vs 1.86%/yr for NEAGX.
Performance
NEEGX vs. NEAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NEEGX having a 65.21% return and NEAGX slightly lower at 64.16%. Over the past 10 years, NEEGX has underperformed NEAGX with an annualized return of 17.07%, while NEAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.99% annualized return.
NEEGX
- 1D
- 1.92%
- 1M
- 12.74%
- YTD
- 65.21%
- 6M
- 61.80%
- 1Y
- 99.86%
- 3Y*
- 30.16%
- 5Y*
- 15.00%
- 10Y*
- 17.07%
NEAGX
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- 11.45%
- YTD
- 64.16%
- 6M
- 61.68%
- 1Y
- 94.43%
- 3Y*
- 39.56%
- 5Y*
- 23.57%
- 10Y*
- 22.99%
NEEGX vs. NEAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEEGX Needham Growth Fund | 65.21% | 8.76% | 14.45% | 26.85% | -33.57% | 27.63% | 41.73% | 42.33% | -10.56% | 8.33% |
NEAGX Needham Aggressive Growth Fund | 64.16% | 26.40% | 14.31% | 37.65% | -27.53% | 37.56% | 51.53% | 43.82% | -16.09% | 8.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between NEEGX and NEAGX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2001 | 0.93 |
The correlation between NEEGX and NEAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NEEGX vs. NEAGX — Risk / Return Rank
NEEGX
NEAGX
NEEGX vs. NEAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX) and Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NEEGX | NEAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.54 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.51 | 6.83 | +0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.00 | 26.82 | -1.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NEEGX vs. NEAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEEGX drawdown since its inception was -53.60%, which is greater than NEAGX's maximum drawdown of -41.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEEGX and NEAGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NEEGX | NEAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.60% | -41.80% | -11.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.27% | -14.01% | +0.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.66% | -28.49% | -10.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.35% | -36.31% | -7.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.35% | -36.31% | -7.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.88% | -8.66% | -2.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.98% | 3.56% | +0.42% |
Volatility
NEEGX vs. NEAGX - Volatility Comparison
Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX) has a higher volatility of 12.90% compared to Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX) at 11.64%. This indicates that NEEGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NEEGX | NEAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.90% | 11.64% | +1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.94% | 22.15% | +0.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.97% | 27.36% | +1.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.72% | 24.92% | +3.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.53% | 24.34% | +1.19% |
NEEGX vs. NEAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NEEGX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is lower than NEAGX's 1.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
NEEGX vs. NEAGX - Dividend Comparison
NEEGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, more than NEAGX's 1.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEAGX Needham Aggressive Growth Fund | 1.30% | 2.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.10% | 3.91% | 10.64% | 16.57% | 5.17% | 6.72% | 11.88% |
NEEGX Needham Growth Fund | 4.58% | 7.57% | 3.92% | 0.00% | 1.78% | 6.92% | 5.73% | 11.31% | 17.79% | 9.70% | 4.22% | 6.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, NEEGX and NEAGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
NEEGX has higher volatility (12.90%) compared to NEAGX (11.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEEGX dropped -53.60% vs NEAGX's -41.80%.
NEAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs 3.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NEEGX and NEAGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer