NMANX vs. VGHAX

In the year-to-date period, NMANX achieves a -6.40% return, which is significantly lower than VGHAX's -3.84% return. Over the past 10 years, NMANX has underperformed VGHAX with an annualized return of 1.68%, while VGHAX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.99% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

NMANX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than VGHAX's 0.25% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund (NMANX) and Vanguard Health Care Fund Admiral Shares (VGHAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current NMANX Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is higher than the VGHAX Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMANX and VGHAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

NMANX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VGHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.14%.

The maximum NMANX drawdown since its inception was -82.03%, which is greater than VGHAX's maximum drawdown of -36.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMANX and VGHAX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund (NMANX) has a higher volatility of 13.99% compared to Vanguard Health Care Fund Admiral Shares (VGHAX) at 9.00%. This indicates that NMANX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGHAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.