NMANX vs. PRWAX

In the year-to-date period, NMANX achieves a -6.40% return, which is significantly lower than PRWAX's -4.98% return. Over the past 10 years, NMANX has outperformed PRWAX with an annualized return of 9.15%, while PRWAX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.57% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

NMANX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than PRWAX's 0.76% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund (NMANX) and T. Rowe Price All-Cap Opportunities Fund (PRWAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current NMANX Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is higher than the PRWAX Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMANX and PRWAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

NMANX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.52%, more than PRWAX's 0.07% yield.

The maximum NMANX drawdown since its inception was -60.10%, smaller than the maximum PRWAX drawdown of -70.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMANX and PRWAX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund (NMANX) has a higher volatility of 13.99% compared to T. Rowe Price All-Cap Opportunities Fund (PRWAX) at 13.19%. This indicates that NMANX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRWAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.