NMANX vs. NOIEX

In the year-to-date period, NMANX achieves a -6.40% return, which is significantly lower than NOIEX's -5.38% return. Over the past 10 years, NMANX has underperformed NOIEX with an annualized return of 1.68%, while NOIEX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.65% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

NMANX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than NOIEX's 0.49% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund (NMANX) and Northern Income Equity Fund (NOIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current NMANX Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the NOIEX Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMANX and NOIEX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

NMANX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NOIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.35%.

The maximum NMANX drawdown since its inception was -82.03%, which is greater than NOIEX's maximum drawdown of -45.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMANX and NOIEX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund (NMANX) and Northern Income Equity Fund (NOIEX) have volatilities of 13.99% and 13.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.