NMANX vs. NBXG

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

NMANX (Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund) and NBXG (Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connectivity Fund) are both mutual funds - NMANX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Neuberger Berman, while NBXG is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Neuberger Berman. Over the past 5 years, NMANX returned 6.11%/yr vs 5.27%/yr for NBXG. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NMANX charges 0.83%/yr vs 1.37%/yr for NBXG.

Performance

NMANX vs. NBXG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund (NMANX) and Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connectivity Fund (NBXG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMANX achieves a 11.19% return, which is significantly lower than NBXG's 14.98% return.

NMANX

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: 3.16%
• YTD: 11.19%
• 6M: 7.41%
• 1Y: 10.74%
• 3Y*: 17.10%
• 5Y*: 6.11%
• 10Y*: 12.52%

NBXG

• 1D: -4.27%
• 1M: 4.85%
• YTD: 14.98%
• 6M: 11.54%
• 1Y: 28.37%
• 3Y*: 27.22%
• 5Y*: 5.27%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NMANX vs. NBXG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
NMANX Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund	11.19%	5.51%	24.39%	18.21%	-28.82%	9.35%
NBXG Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connectivity Fund	14.98%	24.23%	28.53%	34.92%	-41.41%	-10.72%

Correlation

The correlation between NMANX and NBXG is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2021	0.79

The correlation between NMANX and NBXG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NMANX vs. NBXG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMANX

NMANX Risk / Return Rank: 7
NMANX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
NMANX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
NMANX Omega Ratio Rank: 7
NMANX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
NMANX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

NBXG

NBXG Risk / Return Rank: 26
NBXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
NBXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
NBXG Omega Ratio Rank: 27
NBXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
NBXG Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMANX vs. NBXG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund (NMANX) and Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connectivity Fund (NBXG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NMANX	NBXG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.52	1.48	-0.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.85	2.02	-1.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.26	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.60	1.75	-1.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.74	5.27	-3.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NMANX vs. NBXG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMANX Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the NBXG Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMANX and NBXG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NMANX	NBXG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52	1.48	-0.96
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26	0.20	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.20	+0.31

Drawdowns

NMANX vs. NBXG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMANX drawdown since its inception was -72.14%, which is greater than NBXG's maximum drawdown of -51.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMANX and NBXG.

Drawdown Indicators

	NMANX	NBXG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.14%	-51.76%	-20.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.71%	-16.26%	-1.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.93%	-22.08%	-3.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.10%	-51.76%	+13.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.10%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.31%	-5.41%	+5.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.40%	-21.07%	+3.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.05%	5.40%	+0.65%

Volatility

NMANX vs. NBXG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund (NMANX) is 5.20%, while Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connectivity Fund (NBXG) has a volatility of 7.53%. This indicates that NMANX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NBXG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NMANX	NBXG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.20%	7.53%	-2.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.02%	15.67%	+0.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.34%	19.31%	+1.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.19%	26.13%	-2.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.46%	26.07%	-3.61%

NMANX vs. NBXG - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMANX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than NBXG's 1.37% expense ratio.

Dividends

NMANX vs. NBXG - Dividend Comparison

NMANX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.77%, more than NBXG's 8.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NBXG Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connectivity Fund	8.55%	8.73%	9.42%	10.98%	13.19%	3.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NMANX Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund	20.77%	23.10%	9.85%	3.19%	4.87%	16.30%	9.58%	5.43%	11.70%	8.94%	5.00%	9.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NMANX and NBXG in my portfolio?

NMANX and NBXG have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NMANX or NBXG?

NBXG has higher volatility (7.53%) compared to NMANX (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMANX dropped -72.14% vs NBXG's -51.76%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NBXG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.