NBXG vs. BIT
NBXG (Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connectivity Fund) is Technology Equities fund actively managed by Neuberger Berman, while BIT (BlackRock Multi-Sector Income Trust) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, NBXG returned 5.84%/yr vs 2.25%/yr for BIT. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NBXG vs. BIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBXG achieves a 18.24% return, which is significantly higher than BIT's 0.36% return.
NBXG
- 1D
- -4.47%
- 1M
- 2.58%
- YTD
- 18.24%
- 6M
- 18.41%
- 1Y
- 28.96%
- 3Y*
- 27.77%
- 5Y*
- 5.84%
- 10Y*
- —
BIT
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 0.36%
- 1Y
- -1.27%
- 3Y*
- 6.94%
- 5Y*
- 2.25%
- 10Y*
- 7.36%
NBXG vs. BIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBXG Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connectivity Fund | 18.24% | 24.23% | 28.53% | 34.92% | -41.41% | -10.72% |
BIT BlackRock Multi-Sector Income Trust | 0.36% | 2.31% | 7.43% | 16.78% | -14.41% | 2.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBXG and BIT is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBXG vs. BIT — Risk / Return Rank
NBXG
BIT
NBXG vs. BIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connectivity Fund (NBXG) and BlackRock Multi-Sector Income Trust (BIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NBXG | BIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 0.98 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | -0.14 | +1.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.30 | -0.26 | +5.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NBXG vs. BIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBXG drawdown since its inception was -51.76%, which is greater than BIT's maximum drawdown of -43.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBXG and BIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBXG | BIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.76% | -43.54% | -8.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.26% | -8.99% | -7.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.08% | -10.42% | -11.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.76% | -23.72% | -28.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.02% | -5.19% | -0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.90% | -4.87% | -16.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.47% | 4.82% | +0.65% |
Volatility
NBXG vs. BIT - Volatility Comparison
Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connectivity Fund (NBXG) has a higher volatility of 10.90% compared to BlackRock Multi-Sector Income Trust (BIT) at 2.66%. This indicates that NBXG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBXG | BIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.90% | 2.66% | +8.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.50% | 6.20% | +11.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.04% | 8.27% | +12.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.42% | 12.07% | +14.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.23% | 16.00% | +10.23% |
Dividends
NBXG vs. BIT - Dividend Comparison
NBXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.50%, less than BIT's 11.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIT BlackRock Multi-Sector Income Trust | 11.94% | 11.15% | 10.17% | 9.90% | 9.58% | 8.18% | 8.46% | 8.84% | 9.12% | 8.44% | 11.65% | 8.66% |
NBXG Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connectivity Fund | 8.50% | 8.73% | 9.42% | 10.98% | 13.19% | 3.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NBXG and BIT have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NBXG has higher volatility (10.90%) compared to BIT (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBXG dropped -51.76% vs BIT's -43.54%.
NBXG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NBXG and BIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer