NMANX vs. IMIDX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

NMANX (Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund) and IMIDX (Congress Mid Cap Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, NMANX returned 12.52%/yr vs 11.99%/yr for IMIDX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NMANX charges 0.83%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for IMIDX.

Performance

NMANX vs. IMIDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund (NMANX) and Congress Mid Cap Growth Fund (IMIDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMANX achieves a 11.19% return, which is significantly lower than IMIDX's 16.54% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NMANX having a 12.52% annualized return and IMIDX not far behind at 11.99%.

NMANX

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: 3.16%
• YTD: 11.19%
• 6M: 7.41%
• 1Y: 10.74%
• 3Y*: 17.10%
• 5Y*: 6.11%
• 10Y*: 12.52%

IMIDX

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -1.46%
• YTD: 16.54%
• 6M: 13.49%
• 1Y: 15.84%
• 3Y*: 12.94%
• 5Y*: 5.26%
• 10Y*: 11.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NMANX vs. IMIDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NMANX Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund	11.19%	5.51%	24.39%	18.21%	-28.82%	12.42%	39.45%	33.62%	-6.28%	29.01%
IMIDX Congress Mid Cap Growth Fund	16.54%	-4.88%	18.11%	16.29%	-26.94%	29.42%	30.57%	42.36%	-4.98%	15.91%

Correlation

The correlation between NMANX and IMIDX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2012	0.92

The correlation between NMANX and IMIDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NMANX vs. IMIDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMANX

NMANX Risk / Return Rank: 7
NMANX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
NMANX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
NMANX Omega Ratio Rank: 7
NMANX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
NMANX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

IMIDX

IMIDX Risk / Return Rank: 12
IMIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
IMIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
IMIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
IMIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
IMIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMANX vs. IMIDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund (NMANX) and Congress Mid Cap Growth Fund (IMIDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NMANX	IMIDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.52	0.85	-0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.85	1.32	-0.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.15	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.60	1.28	-0.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.74	3.39	-1.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NMANX vs. IMIDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMANX Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the IMIDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMANX and IMIDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NMANX	IMIDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52	0.85	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26	0.25	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	0.57	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.66	-0.14

Drawdowns

NMANX vs. IMIDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMANX drawdown since its inception was -72.14%, which is greater than IMIDX's maximum drawdown of -35.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMANX and IMIDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NMANX	IMIDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.14%	-35.15%	-36.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.71%	-12.10%	-5.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.93%	-23.49%	-2.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.10%	-34.88%	-3.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.10%	-35.15%	-2.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.31%	-1.46%	+1.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.40%	-7.20%	-10.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.05%	4.55%	+1.50%

Volatility

NMANX vs. IMIDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund (NMANX) is 5.20%, while Congress Mid Cap Growth Fund (IMIDX) has a volatility of 5.89%. This indicates that NMANX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMIDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NMANX	IMIDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.20%	5.89%	-0.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.02%	14.92%	+1.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.34%	18.29%	+2.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.19%	21.39%	+1.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.46%	21.11%	+1.35%

NMANX vs. IMIDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMANX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than IMIDX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

NMANX vs. IMIDX - Dividend Comparison

NMANX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.77%, more than IMIDX's 11.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IMIDX Congress Mid Cap Growth Fund	11.39%	13.27%	27.75%	6.27%	5.80%	12.29%	2.06%	10.80%	2.99%	0.04%	1.11%	0.80%
NMANX Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund	20.77%	23.10%	9.85%	3.19%	4.87%	16.30%	9.58%	5.43%	11.70%	8.94%	5.00%	9.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NMANX and IMIDX in my portfolio?

NMANX and IMIDX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NMANX or IMIDX?

IMIDX has higher volatility (5.89%) compared to NMANX (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMANX dropped -72.14% vs IMIDX's -35.15%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IMIDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.