PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMIDX vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMIDX vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Congress Mid Cap Growth Fund (IMIDX) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMIDX achieves a 18.73% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 8.84% return. Over the past 10 years, IMIDX has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 12.32%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.58% annualized return.


IMIDX

1D
1.39%
1M
3.99%
YTD
18.73%
6M
15.94%
1Y
18.19%
3Y*
12.37%
5Y*
5.67%
10Y*
12.32%

DGRO

1D
0.08%
1M
0.48%
YTD
8.84%
6M
8.25%
1Y
22.81%
3Y*
16.80%
5Y*
11.08%
10Y*
13.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMIDX vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMIDX
Congress Mid Cap Growth Fund
18.73%-4.88%18.11%16.29%-26.94%29.42%30.57%42.36%-4.98%15.91%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
8.84%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between IMIDX and DGRO is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014

0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between IMIDX and DGRO has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMIDX vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMIDX
IMIDX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
IMIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
IMIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMIDX vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Congress Mid Cap Growth Fund (IMIDX) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IMIDXDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.43

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

3.54

-2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.92

13.67

-9.75

IMIDX vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMIDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMIDX and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IMIDX vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMIDX drawdown since its inception was -35.15%, roughly equal to the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMIDX and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMIDXDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.15%

-35.10%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.10%

-6.47%

-5.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.49%

-14.03%

-9.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.88%

-19.31%

-15.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.15%

-35.10%

-0.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-1.21%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.18%

-3.43%

-3.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.58%

1.67%

+2.91%

Volatility

IMIDX vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

Congress Mid Cap Growth Fund (IMIDX) has a higher volatility of 6.59% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.64%. This indicates that IMIDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMIDXDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.59%

2.64%

+3.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.63%

6.94%

+8.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.01%

9.55%

+9.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.52%

13.80%

+7.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.17%

16.63%

+4.54%

IMIDX vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMIDX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

IMIDX vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

IMIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.18%, more than DGRO's 1.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.97%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
IMIDX
Congress Mid Cap Growth Fund
11.18%13.27%27.75%6.27%5.80%12.29%2.06%10.80%2.99%0.04%1.11%0.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


IMIDX and DGRO have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IMIDX has higher volatility (6.59%) compared to DGRO (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMIDX dropped -35.15% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMIDX and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer