NLSIX vs. JAKRX
NLSIX (Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund) and JAKRX (John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class A) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past year, NLSIX returned 6.09% vs 26.98% for JAKRX. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NLSIX charges 1.28%/yr vs 1.91%/yr for JAKRX.
Performance
NLSIX vs. JAKRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NLSIX achieves a 2.34% return, which is significantly lower than JAKRX's 13.30% return.
NLSIX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 2.34%
- 6M
- 1.99%
- 1Y
- 6.09%
- 3Y*
- 7.70%
- 5Y*
- 5.67%
- 10Y*
- 6.86%
JAKRX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 1.79%
- YTD
- 13.30%
- 6M
- 14.12%
- 1Y
- 26.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NLSIX vs. JAKRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NLSIX Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund | 2.34% | 6.35% |
JAKRX John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class A | 13.30% | 17.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between NLSIX and JAKRX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NLSIX vs. JAKRX — Risk / Return Rank
NLSIX
JAKRX
NLSIX vs. JAKRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX) and John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class A (JAKRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NLSIX | JAKRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.73 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 5.20 | -3.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.44 | 18.31 | -12.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NLSIX | JAKRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | 3.63 | -2.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 4.06 | -3.10 |
Drawdowns
NLSIX vs. JAKRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NLSIX drawdown since its inception was -14.75%, which is greater than JAKRX's maximum drawdown of -5.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLSIX and JAKRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NLSIX | JAKRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.75% | -5.16% | -9.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.39% | -5.16% | +0.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -0.22% | -0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.02% | -0.80% | -1.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.13% | 1.46% | -0.33% |
Volatility
NLSIX vs. JAKRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX) is 1.42%, while John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class A (JAKRX) has a volatility of 2.36%. This indicates that NLSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JAKRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NLSIX | JAKRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.42% | 2.36% | -0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.93% | 5.84% | -1.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.91% | 7.44% | -2.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.66% | 7.29% | -0.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.32% | 7.29% | +0.03% |
NLSIX vs. JAKRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NLSIX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is lower than JAKRX's 1.91% expense ratio.
Dividends
NLSIX vs. JAKRX - Dividend Comparison
NLSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than JAKRX's 7.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JAKRX John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class A | 7.15% | 8.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NLSIX Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.02% | 0.97% | 7.01% | 1.13% | 2.15% | 2.39% | 5.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NLSIX and JAKRX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JAKRX has higher volatility (2.36%) compared to NLSIX (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NLSIX dropped -14.75% vs JAKRX's -5.16%.
JAKRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.62 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NLSIX and JAKRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer