JAKRX vs. PWLIX
JAKRX (John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class A) and PWLIX (PIMCO RAE Worldwide Long/Short PLUS Fund) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past year, JAKRX returned 20.68% vs 1.90% for PWLIX. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. JAKRX charges 1.91%/yr vs 1.19%/yr for PWLIX.
Performance
JAKRX vs. PWLIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JAKRX achieves a 11.50% return, which is significantly higher than PWLIX's 1.13% return.
JAKRX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.55%
- 6M
- 9.79%
- YTD
- 11.50%
- 1Y
- 20.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PWLIX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -1.35%
- 6M
- 1.27%
- YTD
- 1.13%
- 1Y
- 1.90%
- 3Y*
- 5.29%
- 5Y*
- 4.75%
- 10Y*
- 4.20%
JAKRX vs. PWLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JAKRX John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class A | 11.50% | 17.04% |
PWLIX PIMCO RAE Worldwide Long/Short PLUS Fund | 1.13% | 0.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between JAKRX and PWLIX is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2025 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JAKRX vs. PWLIX — Risk / Return Rank
JAKRX
PWLIX
JAKRX vs. PWLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class A (JAKRX) and PIMCO RAE Worldwide Long/Short PLUS Fund (PWLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JAKRX | PWLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.04 | +0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.04 | 0.15 | +3.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.11 | 0.36 | +11.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JAKRX vs. PWLIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JAKRX drawdown since its inception was -5.16%, smaller than the maximum PWLIX drawdown of -26.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAKRX and PWLIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JAKRX | PWLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.16% | -26.92% | +21.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.16% | -10.30% | +5.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -11.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.07% | -7.65% | +5.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.95% | -4.22% | +3.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.72% | 4.18% | -2.46% |
Volatility
JAKRX vs. PWLIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class A (JAKRX) is 2.57%, while PIMCO RAE Worldwide Long/Short PLUS Fund (PWLIX) has a volatility of 4.73%. This indicates that JAKRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PWLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JAKRX | PWLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.57% | 4.73% | -2.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.41% | 7.57% | -1.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.86% | 9.50% | -1.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.53% | 9.16% | -1.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.53% | 9.07% | -1.54% |
JAKRX vs. PWLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JAKRX has a 1.91% expense ratio, which is higher than PWLIX's 1.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
JAKRX vs. PWLIX - Dividend Comparison
JAKRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.27%, more than PWLIX's 4.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JAKRX John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class A | 7.27% | 8.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PWLIX PIMCO RAE Worldwide Long/Short PLUS Fund | 4.87% | 6.65% | 4.75% | 5.51% | 14.75% | 11.99% | 7.31% | 6.79% | 0.39% | 10.82% | 4.16% | 3.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JAKRX and PWLIX have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PWLIX has higher volatility (4.73%) compared to JAKRX (2.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAKRX dropped -5.16% vs PWLIX's -26.92%.
JAKRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JAKRX and PWLIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer