PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NLSIX vs. BGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NLSIX vs. BGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX) and Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund (BGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NLSIX achieves a 2.09% return, which is significantly higher than BGX's -4.05% return. Over the past 10 years, NLSIX has outperformed BGX with an annualized return of 6.83%, while BGX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.09% annualized return.


NLSIX

1D
0.20%
1M
0.98%
6M
1.64%
YTD
2.09%
1Y
5.23%
3Y*
7.51%
5Y*
4.89%
10Y*
6.83%

BGX

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.57%
6M
-4.38%
YTD
-4.05%
1Y
-5.57%
3Y*
8.06%
5Y*
2.41%
10Y*
6.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NLSIX vs. BGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NLSIX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund
2.09%7.20%7.47%13.10%-6.85%9.01%15.27%17.11%-6.92%13.39%
BGX
Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund
-4.05%2.09%19.83%18.92%-20.57%17.54%-5.67%24.98%-4.19%7.28%

Correlation

The correlation between NLSIX and BGX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2011

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NLSIX vs. BGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NLSIX
NLSIX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
NLSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NLSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
NLSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
NLSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
NLSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

BGX
BGX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NLSIX vs. BGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX) and Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund (BGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NLSIXBGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

0.88

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

-0.45

+1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.08

-0.88

+4.96

NLSIX vs. BGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NLSIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is higher than the BGX Sharpe Ratio of -0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NLSIX and BGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NLSIX vs. BGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NLSIX drawdown since its inception was -14.75%, smaller than the maximum BGX drawdown of -47.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLSIX and BGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NLSIXBGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.75%

-47.40%

+32.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.39%

-12.43%

+8.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.90%

-14.08%

+7.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.79%

-25.94%

+15.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.75%

-47.40%

+32.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

-7.73%

+6.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.01%

-6.99%

+4.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.23%

6.38%

-5.15%

Volatility

NLSIX vs. BGX - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX) has a higher volatility of 2.09% compared to Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund (BGX) at 1.02%. This indicates that NLSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NLSIXBGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.09%

1.02%

+1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.48%

5.71%

-1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.28%

7.84%

-2.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.70%

11.73%

-5.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.33%

17.51%

-10.18%

NLSIX vs. BGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NLSIX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is lower than BGX's 1.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

NLSIX vs. BGX - Dividend Comparison

NLSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than BGX's 9.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BGX
Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund
9.06%8.87%9.89%11.71%8.15%7.01%8.76%9.35%11.74%7.12%9.01%8.72%
NLSIX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund
0.05%0.05%0.02%0.97%7.01%1.13%2.15%2.39%5.91%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


NLSIX and BGX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NLSIX has higher volatility (2.09%) compared to BGX (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NLSIX dropped -14.75% vs BGX's -47.40%.

NLSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NLSIX and BGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer