BGX vs. BIVIX
BGX (Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund) and BIVIX (Invenomic Fund Institutional Class) are both Long-Short funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BGX returned 2.41%/yr vs 13.32%/yr for BIVIX. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BGX charges 1.46%/yr vs 3.17%/yr for BIVIX.
Performance
BGX vs. BIVIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGX achieves a -4.05% return, which is significantly higher than BIVIX's -6.05% return.
BGX
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- 6M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- -4.05%
- 1Y
- -5.57%
- 3Y*
- 8.06%
- 5Y*
- 2.41%
- 10Y*
- 6.09%
BIVIX
- 1D
- 1.96%
- 1M
- 7.92%
- 6M
- -1.71%
- YTD
- -6.05%
- 1Y
- -2.49%
- 3Y*
- -1.95%
- 5Y*
- 13.32%
- 10Y*
- —
BGX vs. BIVIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGX Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund | -4.05% | 2.09% | 19.83% | 18.92% | -20.57% | 17.54% | -5.67% | 24.98% | -4.19% | 2.85% |
BIVIX Invenomic Fund Institutional Class | -6.05% | 4.63% | -8.81% | 16.80% | 50.01% | 63.81% | 11.46% | 11.59% | 3.68% | 8.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGX and BIVIX is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017 | 0.04 |
The correlation between BGX and BIVIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGX vs. BIVIX — Risk / Return Rank
BGX
BIVIX
BGX vs. BIVIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund (BGX) and Invenomic Fund Institutional Class (BIVIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BGX | BIVIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.01 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.45 | -0.13 | -0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.88 | -0.35 | -0.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BGX vs. BIVIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGX drawdown since its inception was -47.40%, which is greater than BIVIX's maximum drawdown of -26.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGX and BIVIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGX | BIVIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.40% | -26.95% | -20.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.43% | -26.95% | +14.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.08% | -26.95% | +12.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.94% | -26.95% | +1.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.73% | -11.96% | +4.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.99% | -6.03% | -0.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.38% | 9.85% | -3.47% |
Volatility
BGX vs. BIVIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund (BGX) is 1.02%, while Invenomic Fund Institutional Class (BIVIX) has a volatility of 17.20%. This indicates that BGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIVIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGX | BIVIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.02% | 17.20% | -16.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.71% | 26.03% | -20.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.84% | 29.79% | -21.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.73% | 18.31% | -6.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.51% | 18.02% | -0.51% |
BGX vs. BIVIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is lower than BIVIX's 3.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
BGX vs. BIVIX - Dividend Comparison
BGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.06%, more than BIVIX's 2.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGX Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund | 9.06% | 8.87% | 9.89% | 11.71% | 8.15% | 7.01% | 8.76% | 9.35% | 11.74% | 7.12% | 9.01% | 8.72% |
BIVIX Invenomic Fund Institutional Class | 2.34% | 2.20% | 3.95% | 20.15% | 27.91% | 16.08% | 3.15% | 3.19% | 4.79% | 1.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BGX and BIVIX have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BIVIX has higher volatility (17.20%) compared to BGX (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGX dropped -47.40% vs BIVIX's -26.95%.
BIVIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.12 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BGX and BIVIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer