PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NLSI vs. FLM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NLSI vs. FLM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF (NLSI) and First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF (FLM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NLSI

1D
-0.57%
1M
-1.97%
YTD
-0.07%
6M
-0.66%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FLM

1D
-4.55%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NLSI vs. FLM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NLSI and FLM is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2026

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NLSI vs. FLM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF (NLSI) and First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF (FLM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NLSI vs. FLM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NLSI vs. FLM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NLSI drawdown since its inception was -13.82%, which is greater than FLM's maximum drawdown of -4.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLSI and FLM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NLSIFLMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.82%

-4.55%

-9.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.86%

-4.55%

-3.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.05%

-2.27%

-3.78%

Volatility

NLSI vs. FLM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NLSIFLMDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.85%

51.02%

-31.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.85%

51.02%

-31.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.85%

51.02%

-31.17%

NLSI vs. FLM - Expense Ratio Comparison

NLSI has a 2.89% expense ratio, which is higher than FLM's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

NLSI vs. FLM - Dividend Comparison

NLSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, while FLM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


NLSI and FLM have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLM is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLM is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 2.89% for NLSI.

NLSI has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 0.00% for FLM.

NLSI is categorized as Long-Short, while FLM is Building & Construction. They also come from different issuers: Neos and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 2.89% for NLSI and 0.70% for FLM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NLSI and FLM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer