PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
NLR vs. TRFK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

NLR vs. TRFK

Last updated Jul 21, 2026
Documentation

NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) and TRFK (Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NLR is a Uranium fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index, while TRFK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, NLR returned 23.46%/yr vs 41.91%/yr for TRFK. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NLR charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for TRFK.

Performance

NLR vs. TRFK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) and Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NLR achieves a -15.40% return, which is significantly lower than TRFK's 41.76% return.

NLR

1D
0.83%
1M
-17.23%
6M
-29.26%
YTD
-15.40%
1Y
-8.06%
3Y*
23.46%
5Y*
17.81%
10Y*
10.66%
ALL TIME*
3.20%

TRFK

1D
0.61%
1M
-16.90%
6M
38.73%
YTD
41.76%
1Y
48.18%
3Y*
41.91%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
37.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NLR vs. TRFK - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF		-15.40%56.50%14.26%36.67%-1.54%
TRFK
Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF		41.76%26.81%38.30%66.63%-10.61%

Correlation

The correlation between NLR and TRFK is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2022

0.54

The correlation between NLR and TRFK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

NLR vs. TRFK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
NLR
TRFK

Energy

48.2%

-

Utilities

26.2%

-

Industrials

21.8%
12.0%

Basic Materials

2.3%
0.9%

Technology

1.6%
87.4%

Communication Services

-

0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

0.0%

Energy

NLR
48.2%
TRFK

-

Utilities

NLR
26.2%
TRFK

-

Industrials

NLR
21.8%
TRFK
12.0%

Basic Materials

NLR
2.3%
TRFK
0.9%

Technology

NLR
1.6%
TRFK
87.4%

Communication Services

NLR

-

TRFK
0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

NLR

-

TRFK

-

Consumer Defensive

NLR

-

TRFK

-

Financial Services

NLR

-

TRFK

-

Healthcare

NLR

-

TRFK

-

Real Estate

NLR

-

TRFK
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF

Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF

Often compared with NLR:
NLR vs. URANLR vs. NUKZNLR vs. URNMNLR vs. OKLONLR vs. GRIDNLR vs. URANNLR vs. SMH
Often compared with TRFK:
TRFK vs. FDTXTRFK vs. DTCRTRFK vs. IDGTTRFK vs. FRATRFK vs. PRNTRFK vs. SPYGTRFK vs. VRGWX

Return for Risk

NLR vs. TRFK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
NLR
NLR Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
NLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
NLR Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
NLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
NLR Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
TRFK
TRFK Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
TRFK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRFK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRFK Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
TRFK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRFK Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NLR vs. TRFK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) and Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

NLRTRFKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.19
1.39

-1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.03
1.87

-1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.24

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.22

2.48

-2.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.50

5.41

-5.91

NLR vs. TRFK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NLR Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is lower than the TRFK Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NLR and TRFK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NLR vs. TRFK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NLR drawdown since its inception was -65.05%, which is greater than TRFK's maximum drawdown of -29.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLR and TRFK.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

NLRTRFKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.05%

-29.06%

-35.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.61%

-19.56%

-17.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.61%

-29.06%

-7.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.61%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.61%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.08%

-18.31%

-17.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.67%

-6.13%

-29.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.20%

8.93%

+7.27%

Volatility

NLR vs. TRFK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) is 9.51%, while Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) has a volatility of 17.12%. This indicates that NLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRFK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

NLRTRFKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.51%

17.12%

-7.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.62%

30.06%

+2.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.18%

34.92%

+8.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.88%

30.45%

-0.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.43%

30.45%

-6.02%

NLR vs. TRFK - Expense Ratio Comparison

NLR has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than TRFK's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

NLR vs. TRFK - Dividend Comparison

NLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, more than TRFK's 0.01% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF		3.01%2.55%0.76%4.54%2.02%1.99%2.23%2.21%3.91%4.86%3.62%3.30%
TRFK
Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF		0.01%0.01%0.40%0.20%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

NLR and TRFK have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRFK has higher volatility (17.12%) compared to NLR (9.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NLR dropped -65.05% vs TRFK's -29.06%.

On 3-year performance, TRFK leads with 41.91% vs 23.46% for NLR. On fees, NLR is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, NLR has been the lower-risk option at 9.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TRFK has performed better with a 41.91% return vs 23.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NLR is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for TRFK.

NLR has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 0.01% for TRFK.

NLR is categorized as Uranium, while TRFK is Technology Equities. NLR tracks MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index, while TRFK tracks Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for NLR and 0.60% for TRFK.

TRFK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NLR and TRFK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer