PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NLR vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NLR vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NLR achieves a -15.40% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 21.36% return. Over the past 10 years, NLR has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 10.66%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.32% annualized return.


NLR

1D
0.83%
1M
-17.23%
6M
-29.26%
YTD
-15.40%
1Y
-8.06%
3Y*
23.46%
5Y*
17.81%
10Y*
10.66%
ALL TIME*
3.20%

SCHD

1D
-0.49%
1M
3.61%
6M
15.19%
YTD
21.36%
1Y
25.66%
3Y*
13.54%
5Y*
9.15%
10Y*
12.32%
ALL TIME*
13.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NLR vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
-15.40%56.50%14.26%36.67%2.29%13.63%3.49%0.20%4.94%8.25%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
21.36%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between NLR and SCHD is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011

0.49

Over the past year, the correlation between NLR and SCHD has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

NLR vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NLR
SCHD

Energy

48.2%
14.1%

Utilities

26.2%
0.1%

Industrials

21.8%
7.8%

Basic Materials

2.3%
1.2%

Technology

1.6%
12.7%

Communication Services

-

6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

7.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

20.6%

Financial Services

-

9.9%

Healthcare

-

20.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Energy

NLR
48.2%
SCHD
14.1%

Utilities

NLR
26.2%
SCHD
0.1%

Industrials

NLR
21.8%
SCHD
7.8%

Basic Materials

NLR
2.3%
SCHD
1.2%

Technology

NLR
1.6%
SCHD
12.7%

Communication Services

NLR

-

SCHD
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

NLR

-

SCHD
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

NLR

-

SCHD
20.6%

Financial Services

NLR

-

SCHD
9.9%

Healthcare

NLR

-

SCHD
20.8%

Real Estate

NLR

-

SCHD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NLR vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NLR
NLR Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
NLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
NLR Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
NLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
NLR Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NLR vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NLRSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.42

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.22

5.59

-5.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.50

13.64

-14.14

NLR vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NLR Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NLR and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NLR vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NLR drawdown since its inception was -65.05%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLR and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NLRSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.05%

-33.37%

-31.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.61%

-4.61%

-32.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.61%

-16.13%

-20.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.61%

-16.85%

-19.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.61%

-33.37%

-3.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.08%

-0.88%

-35.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.67%

-3.30%

-32.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.20%

1.89%

+14.31%

Volatility

NLR vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) has a higher volatility of 9.51% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.63%. This indicates that NLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NLRSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.51%

3.63%

+5.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.62%

7.97%

+24.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.18%

11.05%

+32.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.88%

14.37%

+15.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.43%

16.71%

+7.72%

NLR vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

NLR has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

NLR vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

NLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, less than SCHD's 3.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
3.01%2.55%0.76%4.54%2.02%1.99%2.23%2.21%3.91%4.86%3.62%3.30%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.20%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


NLR and SCHD have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NLR has higher volatility (9.51%) compared to SCHD (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NLR dropped -65.05% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.32% vs 10.66% for NLR. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.32% return vs 10.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for NLR.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.20%, compared with 3.01% for NLR.

NLR is categorized as Uranium, while SCHD is Dividend. NLR tracks MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for NLR and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NLR and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer