PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
NLR vs. META
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

NLR vs. META

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) is Uranium fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index, while META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, NLR returned 12.80%/yr vs 17.39%/yr for META. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NLR vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NLR achieves a -1.81% return, which is significantly higher than META's -14.03% return. Over the past 10 years, NLR has underperformed META with an annualized return of 12.80%, while META has yielded a comparatively higher 17.39% annualized return.

NLR

1D
0.84%
1M
-9.40%
YTD
-1.81%
6M
-3.70%
1Y
19.00%
3Y*
29.88%
5Y*
19.78%
10Y*
12.80%

META

1D
-0.26%
1M
-7.69%
YTD
-14.03%
6M
-11.84%
1Y
-16.71%
3Y*
28.18%
5Y*
11.52%
10Y*
17.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NLR vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF		-1.81%56.50%14.26%36.67%2.29%13.63%3.49%0.20%4.94%8.25%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.		-14.03%13.09%66.05%194.13%-64.22%23.13%33.09%56.57%-25.71%53.38%

Correlation

The correlation between NLR and META is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2012

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF

Meta Platforms, Inc.

Often compared with NLR:
NLR vs. URANLR vs. NUKZNLR vs. URNMNLR vs. OKLONLR vs. GRIDNLR vs. URANNLR vs. SMH
Often compared with META:
META vs. MSFTMETA vs. GOOGMETA vs. AMZNMETA vs. AAPLMETA vs. TSLAMETA vs. SPYMETA vs. NVDA

Return for Risk

NLR vs. META — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
NLR
NLR Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
NLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
NLR Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
NLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
NLR Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
META
META Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
META Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
META Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NLR vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

NLRMETADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.44
-0.51

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.90
-0.54

+1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

0.93

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

-0.54

+1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.41

-1.12

+2.53

NLR vs. META - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NLR Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is higher than the META Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NLR and META, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NLR vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NLR drawdown since its inception was -65.05%, smaller than the maximum META drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLR and META.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

NLRMETADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.05%

-76.74%

+11.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.72%

-33.30%

+3.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.48%

-34.15%

+3.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.48%

-76.74%

+46.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.35%

-76.74%

+42.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.81%

-28.06%

+2.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.70%

-15.83%

-19.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.33%

16.06%

-2.73%

Volatility

NLR vs. META - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) has a higher volatility of 13.73% compared to Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) at 10.17%. This indicates that NLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

NLRMETADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.73%

10.17%

+3.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.75%

26.91%

+6.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.85%

35.52%

+7.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.56%

44.04%

-14.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.22%

38.67%

-14.45%

Dividends

NLR vs. META - Dividend Comparison

NLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than META's 0.37% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.		0.37%0.32%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF		2.60%2.55%0.76%4.54%2.02%1.99%2.23%2.21%3.91%4.86%3.62%3.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

NLR and META have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NLR has higher volatility (13.73%) compared to META (10.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NLR dropped -65.05% vs META's -76.74%.

NLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NLR and META

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer