NLR vs. DXJ
NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) and DXJ (WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - NLR is a Uranium fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index, while DXJ is a Japan Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NLR returned 12.80%/yr vs 18.72%/yr for DXJ. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NLR charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for DXJ.
Performance
NLR vs. DXJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NLR achieves a -1.81% return, which is significantly lower than DXJ's 18.74% return. Over the past 10 years, NLR has underperformed DXJ with an annualized return of 12.80%, while DXJ has yielded a comparatively higher 18.72% annualized return.
NLR
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- -9.40%
- YTD
- -1.81%
- 6M
- -3.70%
- 1Y
- 19.00%
- 3Y*
- 29.88%
- 5Y*
- 19.78%
- 10Y*
- 12.80%
DXJ
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- YTD
- 18.74%
- 6M
- 19.84%
- 1Y
- 54.41%
- 3Y*
- 30.91%
- 5Y*
- 26.01%
- 10Y*
- 18.72%
NLR vs. DXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | -1.81% | 56.50% | 14.26% | 36.67% | 2.29% | 13.63% | 3.49% | 0.20% | 4.94% | 8.25% |
DXJ WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 18.74% | 32.78% | 29.83% | 42.04% | 5.96% | 17.99% | 3.94% | 18.94% | -19.78% | 22.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between NLR and DXJ is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2007 | 0.50 |
The correlation between NLR and DXJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (3 years) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
NLR vs. DXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NLR
DXJ
Energy
Utilities
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Energy
NLR
DXJ
Utilities
NLR
DXJ
Industrials
NLR
DXJ
Technology
NLR
DXJ
Basic Materials
NLR
-
DXJ
Communication Services
NLR
-
DXJ
Consumer Cyclical
NLR
-
DXJ
Consumer Defensive
NLR
-
DXJ
Financial Services
NLR
-
DXJ
Healthcare
NLR
-
DXJ
Real Estate
NLR
-
DXJ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NLR vs. DXJ — Risk / Return Rank
NLR
DXJ
NLR vs. DXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NLR | DXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.54 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | 4.88 | -4.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.41 | 18.93 | -17.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NLR vs. DXJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NLR drawdown since its inception was -65.05%, which is greater than DXJ's maximum drawdown of -49.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLR and DXJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NLR | DXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.05% | -49.63% | -15.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.72% | -10.98% | -18.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.48% | -22.19% | -8.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.48% | -22.19% | -8.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.35% | -39.14% | +4.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.81% | -1.34% | -24.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.70% | -14.32% | -21.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.33% | 2.83% | +10.50% |
Volatility
NLR vs. DXJ - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) has a higher volatility of 13.73% compared to WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) at 4.64%. This indicates that NLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NLR | DXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.73% | 4.64% | +9.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.75% | 13.56% | +20.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.85% | 17.73% | +25.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.56% | 19.02% | +10.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.22% | 20.17% | +4.05% |
NLR vs. DXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
NLR has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than DXJ's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
NLR vs. DXJ - Dividend Comparison
NLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than DXJ's 1.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXJ WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 1.09% | 1.29% | 3.48% | 3.44% | 3.02% | 2.64% | 2.53% | 2.47% | 2.92% | 2.30% | 1.98% | 5.95% |
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | 2.60% | 2.55% | 0.76% | 4.54% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.23% | 2.21% | 3.91% | 4.86% | 3.62% | 3.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NLR and DXJ have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NLR has higher volatility (13.73%) compared to DXJ (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NLR dropped -65.05% vs DXJ's -49.63%.
On 10-year performance, DXJ leads with 18.72% vs 12.80% for NLR. On fees, DXJ is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, DXJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DXJ has performed better with a 18.72% return vs 12.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DXJ is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for NLR.
NLR has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 1.09% for DXJ.
NLR is categorized as Uranium, while DXJ is Japan Equities. NLR tracks MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index, while DXJ tracks WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for NLR and 0.48% for DXJ.
DXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NLR and DXJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer