NLR vs. AMJB
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) and Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJB).
NLR and AMJB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NLR is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the DAXglobal Nuclear Energy Index. It was launched on Aug 13, 2007. AMJB is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the Alerian MLP Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2024. Both NLR and AMJB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
NLR vs. AMJB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NLR vs. AMJB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NLR VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF | 7.24% | 56.50% | 9.35% |
AMJB Alerian MLP Index ETN | 17.28% | 7.91% | 17.90% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NLR achieves a 7.24% return, which is significantly lower than AMJB's 17.28% return.
NLR
- 1D
- 4.76%
- 1M
- -10.17%
- YTD
- 7.24%
- 6M
- 0.63%
- 1Y
- 86.31%
- 3Y*
- 37.32%
- 5Y*
- 23.33%
- 10Y*
- 13.86%
AMJB
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 17.28%
- 6M
- 20.78%
- 1Y
- 13.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NLR vs. AMJB - Expense Ratio Comparison
NLR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than AMJB's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NLR vs. AMJB — Risk / Return Rank
NLR
AMJB
NLR vs. AMJB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) and Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NLR | AMJB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.06 | 0.67 | +1.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.63 | 0.99 | +1.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.14 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.26 | 0.76 | +2.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.88 | 2.01 | +5.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NLR | AMJB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06 | 0.67 | +1.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 1.15 | -0.97 |
Correlation
The correlation between NLR and AMJB is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
NLR vs. AMJB - Dividend Comparison
NLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, less than AMJB's 5.71% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NLR VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF | 2.38% | 2.55% | 0.76% | 4.54% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.23% | 2.21% | 3.91% | 4.86% | 3.62% | 3.30% |
AMJB Alerian MLP Index ETN | 5.71% | 6.52% | 5.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
NLR vs. AMJB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NLR drawdown since its inception was -65.05%, which is greater than AMJB's maximum drawdown of -16.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLR and AMJB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NLR | AMJB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.05% | -16.98% | -48.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.80% | -16.98% | -8.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.97% | -3.00% | -15.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.91% | -3.71% | -32.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.67% | 6.38% | +4.29% |
Volatility
NLR vs. AMJB - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) has a higher volatility of 14.04% compared to Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJB) at 3.70%. This indicates that NLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMJB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NLR | AMJB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.04% | 3.70% | +10.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.94% | 10.23% | +22.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.23% | 20.11% | +22.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.16% | 17.74% | +10.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.39% | 17.74% | +5.65% |