PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NLOP vs. WPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NLOP vs. WPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Net Lease Office Properties (NLOP) and W. P. Carey Inc. (WPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NLOP achieves a 10.31% return, which is significantly lower than WPC's 17.45% return.


NLOP

1D
-0.51%
1M
4.84%
6M
16.98%
YTD
10.31%
1Y
10.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
48.62%

WPC

1D
-0.65%
1M
3.20%
6M
8.37%
YTD
17.45%
1Y
19.59%
3Y*
11.03%
5Y*
4.87%
10Y*
6.94%
ALL TIME*
11.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.86M$1.75M$1.79M
$106.67M$107.35M$111.83M

NLOP vs. WPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
NLOP
Net Lease Office Properties
10.31%5.88%68.89%50.32%
WPC
W. P. Carey Inc.
17.45%24.99%-10.59%26.25%

Correlation

The correlation between NLOP and WPC is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2023

0.24

The correlation between NLOP and WPC shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NLOP:

$173.32M

WPC:

$16.77B

EPS

NLOP:

-$8.15

WPC:

$2.92

PS Ratio

NLOP:

1.91

WPC:

10.54

PB Ratio

NLOP:

1.02

WPC:

1.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

NLOP:

$90.78M

WPC:

$1.56B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NLOP:

-$8.77M

WPC:

$971.12M

EBITDA (TTM)

NLOP:

-$563.00K

WPC:

$1.36B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NLOP vs. WPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NLOP
NLOP Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
NLOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NLOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
NLOP Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
NLOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
NLOP Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

WPC
WPC Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
WPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
WPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
WPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
WPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NLOP vs. WPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Net Lease Office Properties (NLOP) and W. P. Carey Inc. (WPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NLOPWPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.22

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.56

2.18

-1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.33

6.03

-4.70

NLOP vs. WPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NLOP Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the WPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NLOP and WPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NLOP vs. WPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NLOP drawdown since its inception was -19.23%, smaller than the maximum WPC drawdown of -52.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLOP and WPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NLOPWPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.23%

-52.45%

+33.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.65%

-9.71%

-7.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.49%

-4.03%

-8.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.22%

-10.23%

+4.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.43%

3.51%

+3.92%

Volatility

NLOP vs. WPC - Volatility Comparison

Net Lease Office Properties (NLOP) has a higher volatility of 8.28% compared to W. P. Carey Inc. (WPC) at 5.86%. This indicates that NLOP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NLOPWPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.28%

5.86%

+2.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.28%

13.29%

+6.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.77%

17.11%

+6.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.15%

20.85%

+18.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.15%

25.90%

+13.25%

Dividends

NLOP vs. WPC - Dividend Comparison

NLOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 191.03%, more than WPC's 5.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NLOP
Net Lease Office Properties
191.03%27.92%0.00%1.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WPC
W. P. Carey Inc.
5.03%5.62%6.41%7.93%5.43%5.12%5.91%5.17%6.26%7.26%6.65%6.48%

Financials

NLOP vs. WPC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Net Lease Office Properties and W. P. Carey Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NLOP and WPC have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NLOP has higher volatility (8.28%) compared to WPC (5.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NLOP dropped -19.23% vs WPC's -52.45%.

WPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NLOP and WPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer