NLOP vs. CMI

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Net Lease Office Properties (NLOP) and Cummins Inc. (CMI).

Performance

NLOP vs. CMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Net Lease Office Properties (NLOP) and Cummins Inc. (CMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NLOP vs. CMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NLOP Net Lease Office Properties	9.93%	5.88%	68.89%	79.61%
CMI Cummins Inc.	8.13%	49.36%	48.92%	10.76%

Fundamentals

Market Cap NLOP : $172.73M CMI : $76.46B
EPS NLOP : -$9.81 CMI : $20.50
PS Ratio NLOP : 1.96 CMI : 2.27
PB Ratio NLOP : 0.59 CMI : 6.19
Total Revenue (TTM) NLOP : $88.17M CMI : $33.67B
Gross Profit (TTM) NLOP : $60.34M CMI : $8.52B
EBITDA (TTM) NLOP : -$11.34M CMI : $5.06B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NLOP achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly higher than CMI's 8.13% return.

NLOP

• 1D: 1.22%
• 1M: 7.86%
• YTD: 9.93%
• 6M: 11.49%
• 1Y: 15.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CMI

• 1D: 2.24%
• 1M: -5.22%
• YTD: 8.13%
• 6M: 30.54%
• 1Y: 77.68%
• 3Y*: 35.10%
• 5Y*: 19.18%
• 10Y*: 20.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

NLOP vs. CMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NLOP

NLOP Risk / Return Rank: 62
NLOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
NLOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
NLOP Omega Ratio Rank: 55
NLOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
NLOP Martin Ratio Rank: 67

CMI

CMI Risk / Return Rank: 92
CMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
CMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
CMI Omega Ratio Rank: 90
CMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
CMI Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NLOP vs. CMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Net Lease Office Properties (NLOP) and Cummins Inc. (CMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NLOP	CMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.70	2.29	-1.59
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.10	2.89	-1.79
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.40	-0.27
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.07	4.77	-3.70
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.11	15.91	-12.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NLOP vs. CMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NLOP Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the CMI Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NLOP and CMI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NLOP	CMI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70	2.29	-1.59
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.71	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.74	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.78	0.37	+1.42

Correlation

The correlation between NLOP and CMI is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

NLOP vs. CMI - Dividend Comparison

NLOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 191.68%, more than CMI's 1.42% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NLOP Net Lease Office Properties	191.68%	27.92%	0.00%	1.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CMI Cummins Inc.	1.42%	1.50%	2.01%	2.71%	2.49%	2.57%	2.33%	2.74%	3.32%	2.38%	2.93%	3.99%

Drawdowns

NLOP vs. CMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NLOP drawdown since its inception was -19.23%, smaller than the maximum CMI drawdown of -75.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLOP and CMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	NLOP	CMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.23%	-75.66%	+56.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.76%	-16.52%	+1.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.48%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-44.05%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-8.87%	+8.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.76%	-22.31%	+16.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.06%	4.95%	+0.11%

Volatility

NLOP vs. CMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Net Lease Office Properties (NLOP) is 8.58%, while Cummins Inc. (CMI) has a volatility of 10.83%. This indicates that NLOP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NLOP	CMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.58%	10.83%	-2.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.08%	25.18%	-9.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.19%	34.07%	-11.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.98%	27.10%	+11.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.98%	27.88%	+11.10%

Financials