NLOP vs. SOLV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NLOP (Net Lease Office Properties) and SOLV (Solventum Corp) are both stocks. NLOP operates in REIT - Office (Real Estate), while SOLV operates in Medical Instruments & Supplies (Healthcare). Over the past year, NLOP returned 18.16% vs 5.52% for SOLV. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NLOP vs. SOLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Net Lease Office Properties (NLOP) and Solventum Corp (SOLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NLOP achieves a 11.81% return, which is significantly higher than SOLV's -1.11% return.

NLOP

• 1D: -1.98%
• 1M: -11.29%
• YTD: 11.81%
• 6M: 13.44%
• 1Y: 18.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SOLV

• 1D: 2.53%
• 1M: 16.19%
• YTD: -1.11%
• 6M: -8.08%
• 1Y: 5.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NLOP vs. SOLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NLOP Net Lease Office Properties	11.81%	5.88%	36.71%
SOLV Solventum Corp	-1.11%	19.95%	-17.43%

Correlation

The correlation between NLOP and SOLV is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2024	0.23

Fundamentals

Market Cap NLOP : $175.69M SOLV : $13.75B
EPS NLOP : -$8.15 SOLV : $8.17
PS Ratio NLOP : 1.94 SOLV : 1.66
PB Ratio NLOP : 1.03 SOLV : 2.77
Total Revenue (TTM) NLOP : $90.78M SOLV : $8.26B
Gross Profit (TTM) NLOP : -$8.77M SOLV : $4.43B
EBITDA (TTM) NLOP : -$563.00K SOLV : $2.62B

Return for Risk

NLOP vs. SOLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NLOP

NLOP Risk / Return Rank: 63
NLOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
NLOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
NLOP Omega Ratio Rank: 59
NLOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
NLOP Martin Ratio Rank: 69

SOLV

SOLV Risk / Return Rank: 44
SOLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
SOLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
SOLV Omega Ratio Rank: 40
SOLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
SOLV Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NLOP vs. SOLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Net Lease Office Properties (NLOP) and Solventum Corp (SOLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NLOP	SOLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.80	0.21	+0.59
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.19	0.49	+0.71
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.06	+0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.21	0.20	+1.01
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.48	0.46	+3.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NLOP vs. SOLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NLOP Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is higher than the SOLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NLOP and SOLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NLOP	SOLV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80	0.21	+0.59
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.68	-0.03	+1.71

Drawdowns

NLOP vs. SOLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NLOP drawdown since its inception was -19.23%, smaller than the maximum SOLV drawdown of -39.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLOP and SOLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	NLOP	SOLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.23%	-39.97%	+20.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.03%	-27.46%	+12.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.29%	-9.03%	-2.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.73%	-15.48%	+9.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.23%	11.97%	-6.74%

Volatility

NLOP vs. SOLV - Volatility Comparison

Net Lease Office Properties (NLOP) has a higher volatility of 11.33% compared to Solventum Corp (SOLV) at 6.25%. This indicates that NLOP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SOLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NLOP	SOLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.33%	6.25%	+5.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.00%	20.13%	-0.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.78%	26.77%	-3.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.55%	31.79%	+6.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.55%	31.79%	+6.76%

Dividends

NLOP vs. SOLV - Dividend Comparison

NLOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 188.45%, while SOLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
NLOP Net Lease Office Properties	188.45%	27.92%	0.00%	1.84%
SOLV Solventum Corp	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NLOP and SOLV in my portfolio?

NLOP and SOLV have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NLOP or SOLV?

NLOP has higher volatility (11.33%) compared to SOLV (6.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NLOP dropped -19.23% vs SOLV's -39.97%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NLOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.