NLOP vs. SOLV

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Net Lease Office Properties (NLOP) and Solventum Corp (SOLV).

Performance

NLOP vs. SOLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Net Lease Office Properties (NLOP) and Solventum Corp (SOLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NLOP vs. SOLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NLOP Net Lease Office Properties	8.61%	5.88%	36.71%
SOLV Solventum Corp	-17.59%	19.95%	-17.43%

Fundamentals

Market Cap NLOP : $170.66M SOLV : $11.45B
EPS NLOP : -$9.81 SOLV : $8.88
PS Ratio NLOP : 1.94 SOLV : 1.38
PB Ratio NLOP : 0.58 SOLV : 2.27
Total Revenue (TTM) NLOP : $88.17M SOLV : $8.33B
Gross Profit (TTM) NLOP : $60.34M SOLV : $4.45B
EBITDA (TTM) NLOP : -$11.34M SOLV : $2.81B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NLOP achieves a 8.61% return, which is significantly higher than SOLV's -17.59% return.

NLOP

• 1D: 1.95%
• 1M: 9.14%
• YTD: 8.61%
• 6M: 9.67%
• 1Y: 14.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SOLV

• 1D: 2.92%
• 1M: -11.99%
• YTD: -17.59%
• 6M: -10.55%
• 1Y: -14.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

NLOP vs. SOLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NLOP

NLOP Risk / Return Rank: 61
NLOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
NLOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
NLOP Omega Ratio Rank: 54
NLOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
NLOP Martin Ratio Rank: 66

SOLV

SOLV Risk / Return Rank: 21
SOLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
SOLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
SOLV Omega Ratio Rank: 21
SOLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
SOLV Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NLOP vs. SOLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Net Lease Office Properties (NLOP) and Solventum Corp (SOLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NLOP	SOLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.65	-0.45	+1.10
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.04	-0.45	+1.49
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	0.94	+0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.94	-0.47	+1.41
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.75	-1.23	+3.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NLOP vs. SOLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NLOP Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is higher than the SOLV Sharpe Ratio of -0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NLOP and SOLV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NLOP	SOLV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65	-0.45	+1.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.76	-0.30	+2.06

Correlation

The correlation between NLOP and SOLV is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

NLOP vs. SOLV - Dividend Comparison

NLOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 194.01%, while SOLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
NLOP Net Lease Office Properties	194.01%	27.92%	0.00%	1.84%
SOLV Solventum Corp	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

NLOP vs. SOLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NLOP drawdown since its inception was -19.23%, smaller than the maximum SOLV drawdown of -39.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLOP and SOLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	NLOP	SOLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.23%	-39.97%	+20.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.76%	-27.14%	+12.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-24.19%	+24.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.77%	-15.29%	+9.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.06%	10.24%	-5.18%

Volatility

NLOP vs. SOLV - Volatility Comparison

Net Lease Office Properties (NLOP) has a higher volatility of 8.99% compared to Solventum Corp (SOLV) at 7.84%. This indicates that NLOP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SOLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NLOP	SOLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.99%	7.84%	+1.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.08%	20.74%	-4.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.16%	31.74%	-9.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.01%	32.26%	+6.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.01%	32.26%	+6.75%

Financials