PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NLOP vs. SOLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NLOP vs. SOLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Net Lease Office Properties (NLOP) and Solventum Corp (SOLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NLOP achieves a 7.95% return, which is significantly higher than SOLV's -6.63% return.


NLOP

1D
-0.78%
1M
-3.46%
YTD
7.95%
6M
8.84%
1Y
6.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SOLV

1D
0.58%
1M
-3.70%
YTD
-6.63%
6M
-8.14%
1Y
1.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NLOP vs. SOLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NLOP
Net Lease Office Properties
7.95%5.88%34.06%
SOLV
Solventum Corp
-6.63%19.95%-27.45%

Correlation

The correlation between NLOP and SOLV is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2024

0.24

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NLOP:

$169.62M

SOLV:

$12.99B

EPS

NLOP:

-$8.15

SOLV:

$8.17

PS Ratio

NLOP:

1.87

SOLV:

1.57

PB Ratio

NLOP:

1.00

SOLV:

2.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

NLOP:

$90.78M

SOLV:

$8.26B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NLOP:

-$8.77M

SOLV:

$4.43B

EBITDA (TTM)

NLOP:

-$563.00K

SOLV:

$2.62B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NLOP vs. SOLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NLOP
NLOP Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
NLOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NLOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
NLOP Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
NLOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
NLOP Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

SOLV
SOLV Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SOLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOLV Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SOLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOLV Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NLOP vs. SOLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Net Lease Office Properties (NLOP) and Solventum Corp (SOLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NLOPSOLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.03

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.46

0.04

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.16

0.08

+1.07

NLOP vs. SOLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NLOP Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is higher than the SOLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NLOP and SOLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NLOP vs. SOLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NLOP drawdown since its inception was -19.23%, smaller than the maximum SOLV drawdown of -47.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLOP and SOLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NLOPSOLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.23%

-47.26%

+28.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.03%

-27.46%

+12.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.36%

-18.74%

+4.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.88%

-22.82%

+16.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.93%

12.18%

-6.25%

Volatility

NLOP vs. SOLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Net Lease Office Properties (NLOP) is 3.79%, while Solventum Corp (SOLV) has a volatility of 10.12%. This indicates that NLOP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NLOPSOLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.79%

10.12%

-6.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.72%

21.45%

-1.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.69%

28.11%

-5.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.53%

33.04%

+6.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.53%

33.04%

+6.49%

Dividends

NLOP vs. SOLV - Dividend Comparison

NLOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 195.20%, while SOLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
NLOP
Net Lease Office Properties
195.20%27.92%0.00%1.84%
SOLV
Solventum Corp
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NLOP vs. SOLV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Net Lease Office Properties and Solventum Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00BAprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
2.01B
(NLOP) Total Revenue
(SOLV) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NLOP and SOLV have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOLV has higher volatility (10.12%) compared to NLOP (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NLOP dropped -19.23% vs SOLV's -47.26%.

NLOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.30 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NLOP and SOLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer