PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NLOP vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NLOP vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Net Lease Office Properties (NLOP) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NLOP achieves a 11.81% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.91% return.


NLOP

1D
-1.98%
1M
-11.29%
YTD
11.81%
6M
13.44%
1Y
18.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NLOP vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
NLOP
Net Lease Office Properties
11.81%5.88%68.89%79.61%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%10.82%

Correlation

The correlation between NLOP and VOO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2023

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NLOP vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NLOP
NLOP Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
NLOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NLOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
NLOP Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
NLOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
NLOP Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NLOP vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Net Lease Office Properties (NLOP) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NLOPVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.43

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

3.16

-1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.48

14.73

-11.25

NLOP vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NLOP Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NLOP and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NLOPVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

2.39

-1.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.68

0.89

+0.79

Drawdowns

NLOP vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NLOP drawdown since its inception was -19.23%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLOP and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NLOPVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.23%

-33.99%

+14.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.03%

-8.90%

-6.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.29%

-0.70%

-10.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.73%

-3.69%

-2.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.23%

1.91%

+3.32%

Volatility

NLOP vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Net Lease Office Properties (NLOP) has a higher volatility of 11.33% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that NLOP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NLOPVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.33%

2.84%

+8.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.00%

8.90%

+11.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.78%

11.80%

+10.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.55%

16.81%

+21.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.55%

18.01%

+20.54%

Dividends

NLOP vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

NLOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 188.45%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NLOP
Net Lease Office Properties
188.45%27.92%0.00%1.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


NLOP and VOO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NLOP has higher volatility (11.33%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NLOP dropped -19.23% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NLOP and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer