WPC vs. REET

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about W. P. Carey Inc. (WPC) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET).

REET is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index. It was launched on Jul 8, 2014.

Performance

WPC vs. REET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in W. P. Carey Inc. (WPC) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

WPC vs. REET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WPC W. P. Carey Inc.	7.06%	24.99%	-10.59%	-7.93%	0.47%	22.88%	-5.99%	28.84%	1.08%	25.68%
REET iShares Global REIT ETF	1.30%	7.97%	2.65%	10.28%	-24.10%	32.43%	-10.48%	24.42%	-5.27%	7.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WPC achieves a 7.06% return, which is significantly higher than REET's 1.30% return. Over the past 10 years, WPC has outperformed REET with an annualized return of 7.68%, while REET has yielded a comparatively lower 3.46% annualized return.

WPC

• 1D: 1.46%
• 1M: -7.70%
• YTD: 7.06%
• 6M: 3.43%
• 1Y: 13.87%
• 3Y*: 3.12%
• 5Y*: 5.50%
• 10Y*: 7.68%

REET

• 1D: 1.45%
• 1M: -7.25%
• YTD: 1.30%
• 6M: 0.39%
• 1Y: 7.51%
• 3Y*: 6.78%
• 5Y*: 2.64%
• 10Y*: 3.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

WPC vs. REET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WPC

WPC Risk / Return Rank: 67
WPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
WPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
WPC Omega Ratio Rank: 58
WPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
WPC Martin Ratio Rank: 76

REET

REET Risk / Return Rank: 30
REET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
REET Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
REET Omega Ratio Rank: 28
REET Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
REET Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WPC vs. REET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for W. P. Carey Inc. (WPC) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WPC	REET	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.75	0.50	+0.25
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.15	0.78	+0.37
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.11	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.47	0.69	+0.78
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.60	2.90	+1.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WPC vs. REET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WPC Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is higher than the REET Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WPC and REET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WPC	REET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75	0.50	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27	0.16	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30	0.18	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.22	+0.23

Correlation

The correlation between WPC and REET is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

WPC vs. REET - Dividend Comparison

WPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.39%, more than REET's 3.65% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
WPC W. P. Carey Inc.	5.39%	5.62%	6.41%	7.93%	5.43%	5.12%	5.91%	5.17%	6.26%	7.26%	6.65%	6.48%
REET iShares Global REIT ETF	3.65%	3.67%	3.64%	3.27%	2.43%	3.18%	2.65%	5.25%	5.73%	3.84%	5.37%	3.56%

Drawdowns

WPC vs. REET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WPC drawdown since its inception was -52.45%, which is greater than REET's maximum drawdown of -44.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WPC and REET.

Drawdown Indicators

	WPC	REET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.45%	-44.59%	-7.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.96%	-11.70%	+0.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.81%	-32.11%	-4.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.45%	-44.59%	-7.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.70%	-7.39%	-0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.33%	-9.91%	-0.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.53%	2.79%	+0.74%

Volatility

WPC vs. REET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for W. P. Carey Inc. (WPC) is 4.32%, while iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) has a volatility of 4.66%. This indicates that WPC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WPC	REET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.32%	4.66%	-0.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.85%	8.28%	+3.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.57%	15.07%	+3.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.71%	16.92%	+3.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.81%	18.83%	+6.98%