PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WPC vs. REET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WPC vs. REET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in W. P. Carey Inc. (WPC) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WPC achieves a 13.90% return, which is significantly higher than REET's 11.67% return. Over the past 10 years, WPC has outperformed REET with an annualized return of 7.19%, while REET has yielded a comparatively lower 4.37% annualized return.


WPC

1D
1.22%
1M
-2.93%
YTD
13.90%
6M
15.87%
1Y
18.48%
3Y*
10.87%
5Y*
5.43%
10Y*
7.19%

REET

1D
0.77%
1M
1.11%
YTD
11.67%
6M
12.03%
1Y
14.10%
3Y*
11.63%
5Y*
2.85%
10Y*
4.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WPC vs. REET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WPC
W. P. Carey Inc.
13.90%24.99%-10.59%-7.93%0.47%22.88%-5.99%28.84%1.08%25.68%
REET
iShares Global REIT ETF
11.67%7.97%2.65%10.28%-24.10%32.43%-10.48%24.42%-5.27%7.48%

Correlation

The correlation between WPC and REET is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2014

0.75

The correlation between WPC and REET has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WPC vs. REET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WPC
WPC Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
WPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
WPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
WPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
WPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

REET
REET Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
REET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REET Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
REET Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
REET Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
REET Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WPC vs. REET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for W. P. Carey Inc. (WPC) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WPCREETDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.20

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

1.57

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.66

5.60

+0.06

WPC vs. REET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WPC Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is comparable to the REET Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WPC and REET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WPC vs. REET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WPC drawdown since its inception was -52.45%, which is greater than REET's maximum drawdown of -44.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WPC and REET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WPCREETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.45%

-44.59%

-7.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.71%

-9.04%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.07%

-18.02%

-9.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.81%

-32.11%

-4.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.45%

-44.59%

-7.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.75%

-0.66%

-5.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.26%

-9.75%

-0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.28%

2.52%

+0.76%

Volatility

WPC vs. REET - Volatility Comparison

W. P. Carey Inc. (WPC) has a higher volatility of 7.24% compared to iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) at 4.36%. This indicates that WPC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WPCREETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.24%

4.36%

+2.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.25%

9.39%

+3.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.22%

12.52%

+4.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.78%

16.97%

+3.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.86%

18.85%

+7.01%

Dividends

WPC vs. REET - Dividend Comparison

WPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, more than REET's 3.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
REET
iShares Global REIT ETF
3.37%3.67%3.64%3.27%2.43%3.18%2.65%5.25%5.73%3.84%5.37%3.56%
WPC
W. P. Carey Inc.
5.06%5.62%6.41%7.93%5.43%5.12%5.91%5.17%6.26%7.26%6.65%6.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


WPC and REET have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WPC has higher volatility (7.24%) compared to REET (4.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WPC dropped -52.45% vs REET's -44.59%.

REET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WPC and REET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer