NJNK vs. PHYD
NJNK (Columbia U.S. High Yield ETF) and PHYD (Putnam ESG High Yield ETF -) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NJNK charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PHYD.
Performance
NJNK vs. PHYD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NJNK
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- 6M
- 1.33%
- YTD
- 1.52%
- 1Y
- 5.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PHYD
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NJNK vs. PHYD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NJNK Columbia U.S. High Yield ETF | 1.52% | 9.03% | 0.77% |
PHYD Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - | 2.32% | 8.84% | 1.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between NJNK and PHYD is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024 | 0.80 |
The correlation between NJNK and PHYD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NJNK vs. PHYD — Risk / Return Rank
NJNK
PHYD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NJNK vs. PHYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia U.S. High Yield ETF (NJNK) and Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - (PHYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NJNK | PHYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.10 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NJNK vs. PHYD - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NJNK | PHYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.60% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.48% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.63% | — | — |
Volatility
NJNK vs. PHYD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NJNK | PHYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.90% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.13% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.03% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.72% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.72% | — | — |
NJNK vs. PHYD - Expense Ratio Comparison
NJNK has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than PHYD's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
NJNK vs. PHYD - Dividend Comparison
NJNK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.41%, while PHYD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NJNK Columbia U.S. High Yield ETF | 6.41% | 6.34% | 2.05% | 0.00% |
PHYD Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - | 8.52% | 6.63% | 6.80% | 6.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NJNK and PHYD have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NJNK is cheaper at 0.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NJNK is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PHYD.
PHYD has the higher dividend yield at 8.52%, compared with 6.41% for NJNK.
They also come from different issuers: Columbia and Putnam. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for NJNK and 0.55% for PHYD.
Find the right allocation for NJNK and PHYD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer