PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NIXT vs. IVOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NIXT vs. IVOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Research Affiliates Deletions ETF (NIXT) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NIXT achieves a 18.29% return, which is significantly higher than IVOV's 8.98% return.


NIXT

1D
-1.51%
1M
1.69%
YTD
18.29%
6M
17.24%
1Y
33.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IVOV

1D
-0.30%
1M
1.86%
YTD
8.98%
6M
9.21%
1Y
20.80%
3Y*
13.95%
5Y*
7.51%
10Y*
10.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NIXT vs. IVOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NIXT
Research Affiliates Deletions ETF
18.29%4.94%4.89%
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
8.98%7.61%7.47%

Correlation

The correlation between NIXT and IVOV is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2024

0.88

The correlation between NIXT and IVOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NIXT vs. IVOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NIXT
NIXT Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
NIXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NIXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
NIXT Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
NIXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
NIXT Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

IVOV
IVOV Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
IVOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOV Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOV Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NIXT vs. IVOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Research Affiliates Deletions ETF (NIXT) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NIXTIVOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.24

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

1.97

+0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.69

6.80

+2.89

NIXT vs. IVOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NIXT Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the IVOV Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NIXT and IVOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NIXTIVOVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

1.37

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.58

+0.14

Drawdowns

NIXT vs. IVOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NIXT drawdown since its inception was -27.75%, smaller than the maximum IVOV drawdown of -45.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NIXT and IVOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NIXTIVOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.75%

-45.99%

+18.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.71%

-10.58%

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.37%

-0.31%

-2.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.96%

-5.43%

-0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.47%

3.07%

+0.40%

Volatility

NIXT vs. IVOV - Volatility Comparison

Research Affiliates Deletions ETF (NIXT) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) at 4.07%. This indicates that NIXT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NIXTIVOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.00%

4.07%

+0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.08%

10.61%

+3.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.24%

15.27%

+5.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.31%

19.48%

+3.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.31%

21.73%

+1.58%

NIXT vs. IVOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

NIXT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IVOV's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NIXT vs. IVOV - Dividend Comparison

NIXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than IVOV's 1.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
1.67%1.82%1.74%1.52%1.97%1.78%2.42%1.75%1.87%1.55%1.51%1.66%
NIXT
Research Affiliates Deletions ETF
1.35%1.64%1.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NIXT and IVOV have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NIXT has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to IVOV (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NIXT dropped -27.75% vs IVOV's -45.99%.

On 1-year performance, NIXT leads with 33.50% vs 20.80% for IVOV. On fees, NIXT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IVOV has been the lower-risk option at 4.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NIXT has performed better with a 33.50% return vs 20.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NIXT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IVOV.

IVOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 1.35% for NIXT.

NIXT tracks Research Affiliates Deletions Index, while IVOV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Research Affiliates and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for NIXT and 0.10% for IVOV.

NIXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NIXT and IVOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer