PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NIXT vs. FAB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NIXT vs. FAB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Research Affiliates Deletions ETF (NIXT) and First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FAB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NIXT vs. FAB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NIXT
Research Affiliates Deletions ETF
4.31%4.94%4.89%
FAB
First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
6.46%9.86%3.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NIXT achieves a 4.31% return, which is significantly lower than FAB's 6.46% return.


NIXT

1D
3.90%
1M
-3.26%
YTD
4.31%
6M
6.14%
1Y
20.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FAB

1D
1.17%
1M
-2.86%
YTD
6.46%
6M
9.38%
1Y
21.04%
3Y*
12.84%
5Y*
8.32%
10Y*
10.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NIXT vs. FAB - Expense Ratio Comparison

NIXT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FAB's 0.64% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NIXT vs. FAB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NIXT
NIXT Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
NIXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NIXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
NIXT Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
NIXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
NIXT Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

FAB
FAB Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAB Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAB Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NIXT vs. FAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Research Affiliates Deletions ETF (NIXT) and First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NIXTFABDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.80

1.06

-0.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.30

1.63

-0.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.22

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

1.50

-0.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.64

6.49

-1.85

NIXT vs. FAB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NIXT Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is comparable to the FAB Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NIXT and FAB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NIXTFABDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

1.06

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.34

+0.06

Correlation

The correlation between NIXT and FAB is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

NIXT vs. FAB - Dividend Comparison

NIXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than FAB's 1.66% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NIXT
Research Affiliates Deletions ETF
1.53%1.64%1.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FAB
First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
1.66%1.57%2.00%1.94%1.80%1.32%1.59%1.75%1.96%1.42%1.40%1.62%

Drawdowns

NIXT vs. FAB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NIXT drawdown since its inception was -27.75%, smaller than the maximum FAB drawdown of -63.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NIXT and FAB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NIXTFABDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.75%

-63.29%

+35.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.77%

-14.51%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.07%

-3.79%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.43%

-9.33%

+2.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.36%

3.36%

+1.00%

Volatility

NIXT vs. FAB - Volatility Comparison

Research Affiliates Deletions ETF (NIXT) has a higher volatility of 7.53% compared to First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FAB) at 3.80%. This indicates that NIXT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NIXTFABDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.53%

3.80%

+3.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.56%

9.77%

+5.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.04%

19.96%

+6.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.78%

18.78%

+5.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.78%

22.10%

+1.68%