PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NIU vs. SMR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NIU vs. SMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Niu Technologies (NIU) and NuScale Power Corporation (SMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NIU achieves a -34.98% return, which is significantly lower than SMR's -23.36% return.


NIU

1D
-3.90%
1M
-17.92%
YTD
-34.98%
6M
-39.76%
1Y
-45.28%
3Y*
-20.29%
5Y*
-42.31%
10Y*

SMR

1D
-3.38%
1M
-4.74%
YTD
-23.36%
6M
-32.00%
1Y
-70.25%
3Y*
14.31%
5Y*
1.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NIU vs. SMR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
NIU
Niu Technologies
-34.98%69.27%-18.26%-58.13%-67.54%-42.57%-2.40%
SMR
NuScale Power Corporation
-23.36%-20.97%444.98%-67.93%2.29%-0.89%1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between NIU and SMR is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2020

0.19

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NIU:

$159.27M

SMR:

$3.47B

EPS

NIU:

-CN¥1.14

SMR:

-$2.02

PS Ratio

NIU:

0.24

SMR:

114.66

PB Ratio

NIU:

1.32

SMR:

2.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

NIU:

CN¥4.52B

SMR:

$18.10M

Gross Profit (TTM)

NIU:

CN¥881.65M

SMR:

$4.45M

EBITDA (TTM)

NIU:

-CN¥128.12M

SMR:

-$696.20M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NIU vs. SMR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NIU
NIU Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
NIU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NIU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
NIU Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
NIU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
NIU Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

SMR
SMR Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
SMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMR Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
SMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMR Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NIU vs. SMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Niu Technologies (NIU) and NuScale Power Corporation (SMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NIUSMRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

0.90

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.70

-0.85

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.26

-1.20

-0.06

NIU vs. SMR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NIU Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is comparable to the SMR Sharpe Ratio of -0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NIU and SMR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NIU vs. SMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NIU drawdown since its inception was -96.70%, which is greater than SMR's maximum drawdown of -87.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NIU and SMR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NIUSMRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.70%

-87.47%

-9.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-64.57%

-82.86%

+18.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.57%

-82.86%

+18.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.19%

-87.47%

-7.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.01%

-79.67%

-16.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.77%

-35.27%

-30.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.00%

58.68%

-22.68%

Volatility

NIU vs. SMR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Niu Technologies (NIU) is 15.23%, while NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) has a volatility of 31.26%. This indicates that NIU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NIUSMRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.23%

31.26%

-16.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.31%

69.68%

-25.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.03%

103.36%

-37.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

75.52%

93.94%

-18.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

74.84%

89.46%

-14.62%

Dividends

NIU vs. SMR - Dividend Comparison

Neither NIU nor SMR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

NIU vs. SMR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Niu Technologies and NuScale Power Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
904.02M
0
(NIU) Total Revenue
(SMR) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. NIU values in CNY, SMR values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


NIU and SMR have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMR has higher volatility (31.26%) compared to NIU (15.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NIU dropped -96.70% vs SMR's -87.47%.

SMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.68 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NIU and SMR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer