NITE vs. RPG
NITE (The Nightview Fund) and RPG (Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. NITE is actively managed, while RPG is passively managed. Over the past year, NITE returned 20.23% vs 38.51% for RPG. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NITE charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RPG.
Performance
NITE vs. RPG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NITE achieves a -0.70% return, which is significantly lower than RPG's 30.31% return.
NITE
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- -4.33%
- YTD
- -0.70%
- 6M
- -2.70%
- 1Y
- 20.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RPG
- 1D
- -4.60%
- 1M
- 5.48%
- YTD
- 30.31%
- 6M
- 27.62%
- 1Y
- 38.51%
- 3Y*
- 27.72%
- 5Y*
- 11.59%
- 10Y*
- 15.14%
NITE vs. RPG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NITE The Nightview Fund | -0.70% | 22.57% | 19.07% |
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF | 30.31% | 13.41% | 11.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between NITE and RPG is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2024 | 0.73 |
The correlation between NITE and RPG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
NITE vs. RPG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NITE
RPG
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Industrials
Utilities
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
NITE
RPG
Technology
NITE
RPG
Financial Services
NITE
RPG
Communication Services
NITE
RPG
Industrials
NITE
RPG
Utilities
NITE
RPG
Healthcare
NITE
RPG
Basic Materials
NITE
-
RPG
Consumer Defensive
NITE
-
RPG
Energy
NITE
-
RPG
Real Estate
NITE
-
RPG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NITE vs. RPG — Risk / Return Rank
NITE
RPG
NITE vs. RPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Nightview Fund (NITE) and Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NITE | RPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.31 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | 3.49 | -2.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.12 | 13.16 | -9.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NITE vs. RPG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NITE drawdown since its inception was -29.57%, smaller than the maximum RPG drawdown of -53.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NITE and RPG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NITE | RPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.57% | -53.27% | +23.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.16% | -11.08% | -4.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.38% | -4.60% | -5.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.38% | -8.83% | +3.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.92% | 2.93% | +1.99% |
Volatility
NITE vs. RPG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Nightview Fund (NITE) is 7.50%, while Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) has a volatility of 11.10%. This indicates that NITE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RPG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NITE | RPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.50% | 11.10% | -3.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.85% | 19.02% | -3.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.57% | 22.09% | -1.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.72% | 23.86% | +2.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.72% | 22.90% | +3.82% |
NITE vs. RPG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NITE has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than RPG's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
NITE vs. RPG - Dividend Comparison
NITE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NITE The Nightview Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF | 0.15% | 0.24% | 0.25% | 1.44% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.46% | 0.83% | 0.47% | 0.56% | 0.43% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NITE and RPG have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RPG has higher volatility (11.10%) compared to NITE (7.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NITE dropped -29.57% vs RPG's -53.27%.
On 1-year performance, RPG leads with 38.51% vs 20.23% for NITE. On fees, RPG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NITE has been the lower-risk option at 7.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RPG has performed better with a 38.51% return vs 20.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RPG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for NITE.
RPG has the higher dividend yield at 0.15%, compared with 0.00% for NITE.
They also come from different issuers: Nightview and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for NITE and 0.35% for RPG.
RPG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NITE and RPG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer